Lobbyists can provide valuable information, political intelligence, and reelection funding, making legislators with whom they agree more effective.
<h3>What are Lobbyists?</h3>
- Professional advocates who work to sway political outcomes on behalf of people and organizations are known as lobbyists.
- This campaigning may result in the introduction of new legislation or the revision of already-enacted rules and regulations.
- In politics, lobbying, persuasion, or interest representation refers to the practice of legally attempting to influence the decisions, actions, or policies of public servants, most frequently politicians or regulators.
- Many different sorts of persons, associations, and organized groups, including those in the private sector, corporations, other legislators or government officials, or advocacy groups, engage in lobbying, which typically entails direct, face-to-face interaction.
- A legislator's constituents can include lobbyists, which refers to a voter or group of voters in their electoral district, or they can lobby on behalf of a company.
To know more about Lobbying refer to:
brainly.com/question/11846833
#SPJ4
Answer: The correct answer is A: Individualism; collectivism.
Explanation: Individualism focus on the goals and motivations of the individual. An individualist sets her/himself a particular set of objectives based on his terms and identity.
Collectivism focuses more on what's best for the group, what should the individual do to adapt in the best possible way to the group to contribute the most to it.
In this particular case, Lionel fits more the concept of individualism because he is setting himself a particular goal; to behave consistently.
Zlatan fits more with the concept of collectivism because he thinks that he should adapt his behavior to change while with the group.
Therefore, the correct answer is A) Individualism; collectivism.
<em><u>User </u></em><em><u>is </u></em><em><u>very </u></em><em><u>angry.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
<span>Stereotype threat is more
likely to affect those who are high achievers because high achievers are prone
to greater expectations than low achievers. Since expectations are bigger,
whenever high achievers fail, they feel more unworthy of the expectation
towards the people.</span>
Answer:
This is keeping in form with a form of politics known as "Participatory politics".
Explanation:
Participatory politics issues or parpolity is a hypothetical political framework proposed by Stephen Shalom, educator of political theory at William Paterson College in New Jersey.
It was created as a political vision to go with participatory financial matters (parecon). Both parecon and parpolity together make up the libertarian communist belief system of participism; this has essentially educated the Universal Association for a Participatory Society. Shalom has expressed that parpolity is implied as a long-run vision of where the social equity development should wind up inside the field of legislative issues.
The qualities on which parpolity is based are opportunity, self-administration, equity, solidarity, and resistance. The objective, as indicated by Shalom, is to make a political framework that will permit individuals to take an interest however much as could be expected in an up close and personal way. The proposed dynamic guideline is that each individual ought to have say in a choice proportionate to how much she or he is influenced by that choice.
The vision is condemning of parts of current agent popular governments contending that the degree of political control by the individuals isn't adequate. To address this issue parpolity recommends an arrangement of "settled gatherings", which would incorporate each grown-up individual from a given society.
