Answer:
a. behavioral
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing. The options are:
a. behavioral
b. cognitive
c. psychodynamic
d. biological
In psychology, the behavioral perspective is a perspective which proposes that our behavior is learned as a result of our interaction with the environment. In other words, we learn from our environment how to act (based on reinforcement, punishment or by seeing other people's actions) and this learning is what determines our behavior.
In this example, Natassia believes that boys learn to be more aggressive because they are more frequently exposed to external pressures to fight. In other words, <u>Natassia believes that aggression is a behavior that boys learn from their environment through the pressure of other people</u>. Thus, this would exemplify the behavioral perspective.
In the English-speaking part of the world, two-party system is the most common. For example, in the US the two parties are the Democrats and the Republicans.
In many other countries three-and multiple party systems are more common and it is uncommon that a government is not a coalition of two parties (with one or more parties in the opposition)
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
Answer:The ceiling effect
Explanation:The ceiling effect refers to a situation in which an independent
variable (variable which is manipulated during an experiment) does no longer have an affect on a dependent variable (measured variable) This means a researcher can no longer count on his or her treatment as a cause of the results of what s(he) observing
"She finds that a vast majority of her participants, regardless of group assignment, are rated as very aggressive." The most of them acted agressive irrespective of group assignment. This means exposure to the violent movies was no longer an effect for the violence.
