I believe tha answer is d. But I'm not positive
Answer: There are three main examples or conditions of epistemology: truth, belief and justification. There are three types of empiricism: classical empiricism, radical empiricism, and moderate empiricism. Classical empiricism is based on the belief that there is no such thing as innate or in-born knowledge. At its core, rationalism consists of three basic claims. For people to consider themselves rationalists, they must adopt at least one of these three claims: the intuition/deduction thesis, the innate knowledge thesis, or the innate concept thesis. Rationalism is the practice of only believing what is based on reason. An example of rationalism is not believing in the supernatural. Reliance on reason as the best guide for belief and action. He believes that a single person can enter into many different language games in his own lifetime. Some examples of these games are science, sports, and religions. So when a person claims that something exists it means one thing in the religious form of life and another in the scientific form of life.
Explanation:
Answer:
Gilded Age, period of gross materialism and blatant political corruption in U.S. history during the 1870s that gave rise to important novels of social and political criticism. The period takes its name from the earliest of these, The Gilded Age (1873), written by Mark Twain in collaboration with Charles Dudley Warner.
Explanation:
Answer: C. settlement of New Zealand and Hawaii
Explanation:
The proto-Polynesians were adventurous people with highly developed navigational skills. They perfected their maritime and craft techniques through successive generations that went from island to island, starting from Taiwan through the Philippine and Indonesian archipelagos in the west to the Marianas, finally dispersing in the Pacific Ocean. They colonized previously uninhabited islands, making long canoe trips, in some cases against prevailing winds and tides. Sun and star-oriented Polynesian navigators and careful observations of cloud reflections and bird flight patterns were able to determine the existence and location of the islands. The name given to a star or constellation taken as a mark to guide was kaweinga. The discovery of new islands and groups of islands was made through small villages called vanua or "banwa" that sailed in large single-hull and double-hull canoes. Archaeological evidence indicates that by 1280 AD, these travelers had colonized the vast Polynesian triangle with its northernmost corner in Hawaii, the eastern corner at Rapa Nui (Easter Island), and finally the southern corner of New Zealand
McDonald v. City of Chicago, case in which on June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” applies to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.
The case arose in 2008, when Otis McDonald, a retired African American custodian, and others filed suit in U.S. District Court to challenge provisions of a 1982 Chicago law that, among other things, generally banned the new registration of handguns and made registration a prerequisite of possession of a firearm. The next day the National Rifle Association and others filed separate lawsuits challenging the Chicago law and an Oak Park, Ill., law that generally prohibited the possession or carrying of handguns and the carrying of other firearms except rifles or shotguns in one’s home or place of business. Each suit alleged that the law violated the right of individuals to possess and carry weapons, which the Supreme Court had found to be protected by the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). (Anticipating this finding, the plaintiffs in McDonald v. City of Chicago filed suit on the same morning that the decision in Heller was announced.) The crucial question, however, was whether the Second Amendment is applicable to the states and their political subdivisions. Citing “selective incorporation,” the Supreme Court’s gradual application to the states of most of the protections of the Bill of Rights through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which prohibits the states from denying life, liberty, or property without due process of law), the plaintiffs argued that the Second Amendment is applicable through that clause as well as through the amendment’s “privileges or immunities” clause (which forbids the states from abridging the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States)
<u><em>Have a good day, afternoon or night!</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<em> ~Dreamer1331~</em>
