Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
Por qué tú eres perfecta sin el 90 60 90 después del mundo yo darle la vuelta que tenía lado y no me ha dado cuenta que tú eres pero
<span>Understanding the consumers’ expectations of quality, helps a marketer correctly assess the target market’s evaluation of price</span>
A list of sources you looked at while writing a paper
Answer:
long arm statutes
Explanation:
Long arm statutes -
It refers to the statute which enables personal jurisdiction by the court over an out-of-state defendant , is referred to as the long arm statutes .
The defender need to have some specific connection .
Hence , from the given information of the question ,
The correct answer is long arm statutes .
