Answer:
I'm not sure If there are options so this is what I got
<span>
</span><span>Ulysses S. Grant was the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination until chaos struck at the 1880 Republican National Convention.Related Articles<span>Uses of Gold in Ancient EgyptHow to Write a Psychological Case Report in APA StyleHow to Recognize and Respect the Beliefs or Practices of OthersWhere Was Opera Invented?</span>The Republican Party was sharply divided by political factions in 1880, with New York senator Roscoe Conkling’s Stalwarts on one side, and Maine senator James G. Blaine’s Half-Breeds on the other. The Stalwarts were conservative Republicans who viewed themselves as “stalwart” against sitting President Rutherford B</span>
Answer:
No, the court would not have been so lenient with her.
Explanation:
Whether or not Carmela was passive in the situation or she was only guiding her father on how to go about the lawsuit, the court has every right and would have included her in the lawsuit with her father. This is so because her father and she would have been included in the lawsuit in default. Hence, it is not a matter of decency or not, but a matter of what is supposed to be.
The examples are:
<span>-deciding whether a second burger is worth the extra $2
-deciding whether the overtime pay is worth working on your day off
-deciding whether to pay a fine for polluting the local harbor or installing antipollution machinery
In rational behavior, our decision-making process is always based on which decision give the maximum/optimal benefit for use, after deducting all possibilities with a logical approach.
All the actions above represents this very concept of rational behavior.
</span>
- - No.
This is because isthmus is a large piece of land stretching from one area to another.