Answer:
There are some cautions we want to keep in mind as we fashion our final utterance. First, we don't want to finish with a sentimental flourish that shows we're trying to do too much. It's probably enough that our essay on recycling will slow the growth of the landfill in Hartford's North Meadows. We don't need to claim that recycling our soda bottles is going to save the world for our children's children. (That may be true, in fact, but it's better to claim too little than too much; otherwise, our readers are going to be left with that feeling of "Who's he/she kidding?") The conclusion should contain a definite, positive statement or call to action, but that statement needs to be based on what we have provided in the essay.
Second, the conclusion is no place to bring up new ideas. If a brilliant idea tries to sneak into our final paragraph, we must pluck it out and let it have its own paragraph earlier in the essay. If it doesn't fit the structure or argument of the essay, we will leave it out altogether and let it have its own essay later on. The last thing we want in our conclusion is an excuse for our readers' minds wandering off into some new field. Allowing a peer editor or friend to reread our essay before we hand it in is one way to check this impulse before it ruins our good intentions and hard work.
Never apologize for or otherwise undercut the argument you've made or leave your readers with the sense that "this is just little ol' me talking." Leave your readers with the sense that they've been in the company of someone who knows what he or she is doing. Also, if you promised in the introduction that you were going to cover four points and you covered only two (because you couldn't find enough information or you took too long with the first two or you got tired), don't try to cram those last two points into your final paragraph. The "rush job" will be all too apparent. Instead, revise your introduction or take the time to do justice to these other points.
Here is a brief list of things that you might accomplish in your concluding paragraph(s).* There are certainly other things that you can do, and you certainly don't want to do all these things. They're only suggestions:
include a brief summary of the paper's main points.
ask a provocative question.
use a quotation.
evoke a vivid image.
call for some sort of action.
end with a warning.
universalize (compare to other situations).
suggest results or consequences.
Answer:
She relies on ethos by establishing that she has the qualities of a strong leader.
Explanation:
Logos mean to persuade by logic
Ethos means to persuade by credibility
Pathos mean to persuade by emotion
Queen Elizabeth uses ethos to show that she has credibility of being a strong leader. She states "I have the heart and stomach of a king, and of a king of England too, and think foul scorn that Parma or Spain, or any prince of Europe".
In Act I Scene 7 Macbeth seems hesitant abot the assasination of the king to get the crown.Then lady Macbeth tells him about being a real man and she uses these words..." <em>When you durst do it , then you were a man,..And to be more than what you were...you would be so much more the man..."</em>By using these words she calls him a coward and questions his manhood. Then he decides to act, when she implies that he is much less than a man.
Answer:
Sure no problem. I also ran it through Gramarly Premium word check and phrase.
Before:
In The Alchemist, the spiritual unity represented by the Soul of the World binds together all of nature, from human beings to desert sand. This idea underlies the parallel we see in the novel between the alchemist purifying metal into gold and Santiago purifying himself into someone capable of achieving his Personal Legend. According to the novel, the Soul of the World has created an ultimate desire, or Personal Legend, for everything, whether Santiago or a piece of iron. To accomplish its Personal Legend, each thing must learn to tap into the Soul of the World, which purifies it. That continual purification ultimately leads to perfection. This notion of humans, metals, and all other things sharing the same goal demonstrates that all elements in nature are essentially different forms of a single spirit."
After:
In The Alchemist, the profound solidarity addressed by the Soul of the World ties together the entirety of nature, from people to abandon sand. This thought underlies the equal we find in the novel between the chemist refining metal into gold and Santiago cleaning himself into somebody equipped for accomplishing his Personal Legend. As per the novel, the Soul of the World has made an extreme craving, or Personal Legend, for everything, regardless of whether Santiago or a piece of iron. To achieve its Personal Legend, every thing should figure out how to take advantage of the Soul of the World, which decontaminates it. That consistent refinement eventually prompts flawlessness. This thought of people, metals, and any remaining things having a similar objective exhibits that all components in nature are basically various types of a solitary soul."
Can I have brainliest?
