Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
Answer:
9 shirts
Step-by-step explanation:
12 - 6 = 6
6/2 = 3
3 times 3 = 9
Answer:
The diameter of the circle is 14cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Hope this helps
Step-by-step explanation:
9514 1404 393
Answer:
8 in by 16 in
Step-by-step explanation:
In your equation, we presume that x represents the width. Solving for x, we have ...
2x² = 128 . . . . . . given equation
x² = 64 . . . . . . . . divide by 2
x = √64 = 8 . . . . square root
The enlargement will be 8 inches by 16 inches.
