I believe the answer is: A) because he wants to address citizens immediate concerns
When citizens hears the news about a loss battle, their morale would took a hit and their support for the army to join the war would start decreasing. Because of this, Churchill address the issue in order to keep the morale high and the citizens do not lose hope with the cause.
Answer:
The rule which states that if a verb is in past tense, then its subject should be in past tense too and if it's in present tense, the subject should also be in present tense.
“I was amazed at his equanimity in the face of danger.”
The verb "was" is in past tense so is the subject "amazed".
Explanation:
A simple subject-verb agreement definition says that the subject of the sentence and the verb of the sentence must be in agreement in number/tense.
If the sentence is written like this
“I am amaze at his equanimity in the face of danger.”
If the verb "was" is replaced by "am" and the subject "amazed" is replaced by "amaze", the sentence would become incorrect as it disregards the subject verb agreement.
<span>n the section of the general prologue dedicated to the pardoner we learn that pardoner admits to...?</span>
<span>I drove them, all three wailing, to the ships,
tied them down under their rowing benches,
and called the rest: 'All hands aboard;
come, clear the beach and no one taste
the Lotus, or you lose your hope of home.'</span>
Verb means the action of the sentence, the action going on is 'ate', so that is the verb.
