People give different versions of the same story as they want. The Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account is important as His first-hand account contradicts the denial.
The Ottoman government in 1916 was known to have massacres a lot of people.
The Armenian genocide denial was a big case in the world. The claim made by the Ottoman Empire and the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) was that they had no hand in the genocide against the Armenian people during World War I.
This was a very big crime that has a lot of documentation on the numbers of evidences to prove their guilt but they still won't accept that they committed it.
See full question below
Considering that the Ottoman government denied any orders or mass killings, why is Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account important?
A. His first-hand account supports the Ottoman government
B. His first-hand account contradicts this denial
C. He had recovered old documents that support the Ottoman government
D. He had recovered old documents that contradict this denial
Learn more about Ottoman government from
brainly.com/question/25798424
<span>Though often attributed to the romans, the arch was actually conceived by the Greeks.
Arche was originally conceived by the Greeks before it adopted by the Romans between 6-8th century BC. Since the Roman was the largest empire in the world at that time, the world perceives everything that they have were the result of their own creation.</span>
Answer:
Ben Franklin believed a republic needed virtuous citizens.
Explanation:
Benjamin Franklin was an American politician and scientist born in Boston in 1706, being considered one of the Founding Fathers of the nation and the main promoter of the Enlightenment in the American territory. He was a fervent believer in the concept of democracy and in the ability of peoples to govern themselves, through the election of representatives.
Through his political activism, for which he did not access to great positions in the federal government, but to positions of political and social leadership, he opposed authoritarianism and promoted education and innovation in American society, guided by his conviction that the more educated a society was, the better the decisions it would make to govern its destinies.
Answer:
He was pleasant and friendly to people he disagreed with.
Explanation:
hope this helps, brainliest appreciated!
