I would go with <em>b. more efficient ships</em>.
Mechanical motors were very helpful, they helped the ship move, but I don't believe they were the development that aided the explorers the most.
Sure, they could've made maps, but what was the point? If they already knew the layout of the oceans and lands, then they could've easily traveled wherever they pleased without trouble. This also applies for the spherical globe.
A greater supply of efficient ships helped sailers get by tougher tides and harsher weathers. Ships were produced to be better, stronger, and more durable. They were able to handle more weight and carry more passengers.
Furthermore, the production of efficient ships were the development that most aided explorers in their ability to sail the oceans to discover the New World during the Age of Discovery.
(This is all from my logic. I've not read your lesson, therefore, I do not truly know the answer other than using my common sense.)
Hopefully, this helps.
These sentences are written from a third-person omniscient point of view. This means that the story is told by a narrator who is external to the story, i.e. the narrator is not a character. Therefore, the pronouns 'he', 'she', 'it', and 'they' are used to refer to the different characters of the story, as well as their respective names.
These sentences are not written from a first-person point of view because the characters should include their own thoughts or descriptions.
And these sentences are not written from a third-person limited point of view because the story should have been told from a character's perspective.
The meager amount money only supplied them only with a days worth of food.
The <span>neurological doctor specializes in the nervous </span>system.
The people had to completely eradicate what was left of the evidence.
Answer:
C. how the library was arranged
Answer:
Please use this site
Explanation:
Schröder, Martin. “How Moral Arguments Influence Economic Decisions and Organizational Legitimacy—the Case of Offshoring Production.” Organization, vol. 20, no. 4, Aug. 2012, pp. 551–76, doi:10.1177/1350508412448223.
