For the limit approaching 3 from the right, you want to follow the line to the right of x = 3. From the graph you're describing it sounds like that's y = -3.

The RHS limit is -3 even though f(3) = 7
Answer:
Each fraction is greater than the previous fraction.
Step-by-step explanation:
Every statement is true except, the one that says "Each fracton is greater than the previous fraction." This statement is not true. I know it looks like it, but let's think about it. Each fraction is equivalent to 2/3, which means they are technically equal to each other. So that means that each fraction is not greater than the previous one. This means that the statement "Each fraction is equal to the previous fraction in the pattern multiplied by 2/2" is a true statement.
2/3 x 2/2 = 4/6
4/6 x 2/2 = 8/12
8/12 x 2/2 = 16/24
16/24 x 2/2 = 32/48
So that means that the next fraction in the pattern is indeed 32/48, making the last statement true.
Answer: Her estimate is incorrect because she has to have 25 trucks to be able to ship all her boxes.
Step-by-step explanation: Divide 539 by 22 and if there is a remainder then you need to have one more because you cant take half a truck.
539/22=24.5. Since there is a remainder, you will need 25 trucks total
Answer:
substitute that value for x in the polynomial and see if it evaluates to zero
Step-by-step explanation:
A "zero" of a polynomial is a value of the polynomial's variable that make the expression become zero when it is evaluated. As an almost trivial example, consider the polynomial x-3. The value x = 3 is a zero because substituting that value for x makes the expression evaluate as zero.
3 -3 = 0
___
Evaluating polynomials can be done different ways. Straight substitution for the variable is one way. Using synthetic division by x-a (where "a" is the value of interest) is another way. This latter method is completely equivalent to rewriting the polynomial to Horner form for evaluation.
__
In the attachment, Horner Form is shown at the bottom.