Answer:
Explanation:
Productivity per unput dollar=Fees charged from clients/total cost to firm
There are 3 options:
1. Using current software:
Av time=40 min
Researcher's cost=$2 a min
Total cost=40*2=80
Productivity per dollar input=Fees charged from clients/total cost to firm= 400/80=$5
2.
Using company A's software
Av time=30min
Cost of reducing av time=$3.5
Researcher's cost=$2
Total =30*2+3.5=63.50
Productivity per dollar input=400/63.5=6.3
3.
Using company B's software
Av time = 28 min
Cost of reducing av time=$3.6
Researcher's cost=$2
Total cost=28*2+3.6=59.6
Productivity per dollar input=400/59.6=$6.71
Answer - Using company B's software
Answer:
Total fixed costs= $150
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Parker's only overhead is a storage unit for the inventory that costs $125 a month and a $25 monthly fee for website hosting.
<u>A cost is categorized as fixed because it does not vary with production (in relevant ranges).</u>
In this case, the only two cost that is fixed is the storage and website hosting.
Total fixed costs= 125 + 25= $150
Answer:
c. companies that have already developed products for their domestic middle markets and are now seeking to parlay their existing capabilities to serve the external global middle class.
Explanation:
- The global aspirant companies are those that strive for a globally competitive market with the product that is already developed in the market and use for the domestic middle-income countries. That target the global middle classes and serves to the external global environment of the company and is the key to business products in the society.
Answer:
Mitigate his damages
Explanation:
By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.
