Answer:
Naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies
Explanation:
Three of the most common research methods are naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies. Each one of them brings something different to the table:
- Naturalistic observation refers to studying subjects directly on their environment without any intervention from the researcher. This is a great method because watching people behave in a natural way will be very revealing and more truthful. When subjects know they are being observed, they often change their behaviour. Naturalistic observation thus requires the observer to be as anonymous and invisible as possible.
- An interview is a research method where the subject is asked to answer to some specific questions crafted by the researcher. Interviews allow the researchers have a much closer look at the subject, trying to ascertain the motives behind their behaviour. However, a problem with interviews is that the subjects often time won't respond truthfully, but will adjust their answers to what is expected from them.
- A case study is a method that goes more in depth than the other two, and the researcher tries to learn as much as possible about the subject through a variety of other methods, like observations, interviews, surveys, etc. Case studies are much thorough and deeper investigations, but they can be very time consuming, and require a subject that is willing to facilitate the work of the researcher, which isn't always possible.
<u>Aesthetics </u>is defined as the philosophical study of art and of value judgments about art.
The field of philosophy known as aesthetics is focused on the nature and appreciation of beauty, art, and good taste. The phrase "critical meditation on art, culture, and nature" has also been used to describe it.
The Greek term "Aisthetikos," which means "of sense perception," is where the word "aesthetics" originates. Axiology includes aesthetics along with ethics (the study of values and value judgments).
Assessments of aesthetic worth depend on our capacity for sensory discrimination, but they typically go beyond that. A sensory, emotional, and intellectual component all go into making a judgment of beauty.
Immanuel Kant asserts that all things are lovely (i.e. certain things are beautiful to everyone). However, there is a second, more arbitrary element at play in a viewer's perception of beauty—taste.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about Aesthetics here
brainly.com/question/24568271
#SPJ4
The individual will have a large tax bill.
Answer:
The most correct answer for this question would be option D, an online environment that simulates real life. It is also short for VR. If this helps, please rank Brainliest. Thanks!
