the answer to this is
C.
please mark someone brainliest, so they may rank up!
thank yo!
The answer is A.<span>concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it
In concurring opinion, the judges will support the the decision by the court but with different basis/reasonns for its support.
In dissenting opinion on the hand, the judges are disagree with the decision by the court, but it wouldn't affect the previous outcome.</span>
True i believe don't take my word for it tho
Answer:
The evidence that a researcher decides to use should be from a credible source and should be track-able.
It can or cannot back the hypothesis created by the researcher. In both cases, the researcher must synthesis it properly into his research. It must build a connection and somewhat extends the points discussed in the hypothesis.
Either way it should have a direction. Something that does not connect to the core of research must not be added in it.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Imagine you were responsible for releasing an animal after it was raised in captivity. The animal survives well in cold temperatures and eats fish. Describe the type of environment where you would release this animal, and explain your reasoning.
I would release this animal in a tundra kind of weather, like in Russia, for instance- If the animal can resist cold temperatures and eats fish, this could be a bear or a seal. Both animals can very well live in this new environment for them.
THe Artic, in the North Pole, is a classic example of tundra weather, a place where temperatures can be extremely cold.
