<em>D. Is The Answer</em>
Explanation:
Shays' Rebellion originally started due to outrage of the economy and how there was literally nothing the colonists could do about it. Congress couldn't pass anything since the states had too much power and couldn't rally up any sort of military or anything. Shays' Rebellion didn't completely make the US Constitution however it did influence more and more people that something had to happen otherwise the country would eventually die out and mass revolution would begin.
The choices for your question are:
a. It has been proven as a fact.
b. It has been changed over time.
c. It predicts but does not explain.
d. It has stayed the same for a long time.
The main reason why the scientific model of atoms is considered a theory rather than a law is because it predicts but does not explain. The answer to your question is C. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
1.- These 3 arrangements differ from each other, since the Amalgamation, is the mixture of different things, they may be cultures or races, the Assimilation is the process of adaptation of the immigrant to the receiving society. This acquires the culture and customs of the adoption community, disappearing their status as "different". To the extent that the immigrant adopts the culture of receiving society, this will admit you as one more member, producing its full integration. This theory has been strongly criticized, from the ethical point of view, but also by believing that the immigrant will adapt to the new culture, independently of its origin, race or religion. And Pluralism refers to the dominant trend is that neither natives nor immigrants want to lose their identity, and adaptation would occur through the adherence of all, to common principles of coexistence , being able to maintain at certain levels the cultural characteristics of each group and as long as the conflicts that may arise do not affect these basic principles of coexistence, which are those that confer a sense of community and avoid social fragmentation. The most common stereotypes are: Americans, Latins, African Americans, Chinese, they will be more or less frequent depending on the city where you live, Latins are a common stereotype in the northern United States, and I do not think they are harmful to any group, The harmfulness of something or someone does not come from their race, or stereotyping.2.- In my country we experience the 3 arrangements, amalgamation, assimilation and pluralism, nowadays, thanks to globalization, we experience all 3 in many countries of the world, in almost all countries there is a mixture of races and customs derived from foreign citizens, in many of them foreigners adapt so much to the culture that they are inserted very quickly assimilating it as their own, and in many others the different cultures struggle to maintain their origin and customs, giving way to pluralization.
Answer:
i don't know better than me smile and hope you you so much for the day with what you have a wonderful birthday
The answer is<u> "historic linguistics".</u>
Historical linguistics is the study of not just the historical backdrop of dialects, as the name suggests, yet additionally the investigation of how dialects change, and how dialects are identified with each other. It may appear at first this would be a somewhat dull, uneventful field of study, yet that is a long way from reality.
The principle job of historical linguists is to figure out how dialects are connected. By and large, dialects can be appeared to be connected by having a substantial number of words in like manner that were not acquired (cognates). Languages regularly obtain words from each other, however these are typically not very hard to differentiate from different words.
