Wow because if you insert the words into the phrase, only wow sounds right.
Explanation:
1.She asked her to get some fresh cherries from the cherry farm.
2.He adopted it from the local animal shelter.
3.They asked him how he is doing in math.
4.Her mom baked fresh apple cinnamon pie for us.
5.He went fishing with them.
6.They barked at us.
7.He and his family often go to camping trips with us.
<em>hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>helps</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>keep</em><em> </em><em>smiling </em>:)
Answer:
Date:
Subject: Regarding the poor condition of the restrooms.
Dear Sir,
I'd like to respectfully raise your attention to the fact that our school's restroom is in terrible shape. Because of the lack of hygiene, all of the students are unable to use the restrooms.
As a result, I suggest that you take the appropriate measures as quickly as possible, and I will stay grateful to you.
I'm hoping you'll take the appropriate steps,
Sincerely yours,
The answer is: dangling modifier.
Dangling modifiers are separate from the word they modify, resulting in ambiguity, confusion or nonsense. In the example sentence, it is not clear which animal is walking the wire - whether the dog or the squirrel. Supposing the squirrel (which is about to fall) is walking the wire, a correct version of the sentence would be:
My dog waited for the squirrel to fall, which was walking the wire.
