1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nezavi [6.7K]
3 years ago
8

2sin60°. cos60° = cos30°​

Mathematics
2 answers:
Zanzabum3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Zinaida [17]3 years ago
5 0
U need help use app childe it’s name is guthmath it’s red use code name this P9EJ5H it will help free
You might be interested in
Evaluate f(x)=(2x+1)^2 at -2,-1,0,1 and 2
stiks02 [169]

Answer: at -2=9

at -1= 1

at 0=1

at 1= 9

at 2=25

Step-by-step explanation:

F(x)= (2x + 1)²

at -2

F(x) = (2(-2) + 1)²

= (-4+1)²

=(-3)²

=9.

Same goes with all points

5 0
3 years ago
Someone who is financially stable is able to
klemol [59]
Purchase thing with little worry about there money
4 0
3 years ago
235litre in cubic cm<br> the one who will first give answer marks as brainliest
fenix001 [56]
235 liters = 235000 cubic centimeters
(just multiply the volume by 1000)
5 0
2 years ago
Please help will mark brainliest
marta [7]
6=68 and 8=112
This is Bc 1=112 and 1 and 4 are virtual angles so 4 would also equal 112. And 4 and 6 are supplementary angles, and supplementary angles always add up to 180, and since 4 is 112 you’d subtract 112 from 180 and you’d get 68, so 6=68 and 6 and 8 are also supplementary angles so 8 would be 112
6 0
3 years ago
A cellphone provider has the business objective of wanting to estimate the proportion of subscribers who would upgrade to a new
stiv31 [10]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.27 -0.2}{\sqrt{\frac{0.2(1-0.2)}{500}}}=3.913  

p_v =P(z>3.913)=0.000046  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of subscribers that would upgrade to a new cellphone at a reduced cost is significantly higher than 0.2 or 20%

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=500 represent the random sample taken

X=135 represent the subscribers that would upgrade to a new cellphone at a reduced cost

\hat p=\frac{135}{500}=0.27 estimated proportion of subscribers that would upgrade to a new cellphone at a reduced cost

p_o=0.2 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that true proportion is higher than 0.2 or not.:  

Null hypothesis:p \leq 0.2  

Alternative hypothesis:p > 0.2  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.27 -0.2}{\sqrt{\frac{0.2(1-0.2)}{500}}}=3.913  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(z>3.913)=0.000046  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of subscribers that would upgrade to a new cellphone at a reduced cost is significantly higher than 0.2 or 20%

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Could anybody give me some help? I'm a little confused .-. &lt;3
    11·1 answer
  • List the multiples of 8 (up to 100)
    9·2 answers
  • Do these numbers show a proportion? Help me!<br> 93, 15 <br> 62, 10
    15·2 answers
  • 2.5=25% is it true or false​
    8·2 answers
  • What is the volume of this prism ?
    6·1 answer
  • Please help
    8·1 answer
  • How many edges does this shape have? 6 , 9 , 10 , 12​
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone help me and explain
    6·2 answers
  • 8. Are these ratios equvalent?<br> 9: 3 arid 15:5 and 3:1
    9·1 answer
  • So its about grams and kilograms
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!