Answer:
i think the answer is C) Royal authority
I think the best answer is C or D. Don't take it from me though.
Answer:
No it would not have been successful because Gandhi and everyone else who started to create big movements never used force to convey the bigger message. The king in Britain would send troops to stop the uprising if he saw things were getting out of control. Nonviolence was a good approach because this allowed everyone's voices to be heard and prevent unwanted anger if something were to happen to the people that were trying to protest violently. This also effectively brought change to the world because the king really wanted peace in his territories. He only wanted them to be ruled by him and wanted no unrest. He didn't care what they talked about as long as the people didn't over throw him.
Answer:
retroactive interference
Explanation:
Generally, interference is of two types:
1. Proactive interference.
2. Retroactive interference.
Retroactive interference: The term retroactive interference is defined as the inability to remember old information after the formation of new information. In other words, retroactive interference plays an important role in memory as it restrains the capability of old information by new information. It holds back a person to remember old memories.
Well I can be grateful? I mean I’m healthy and that is something you should take for granted
