Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Just stop taking 40 dollars out of the bank every week
Answer:
80 buckets of red paint
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
The ratio of buckets of yellow paint to buckets of red paint in the store to be 3:4
Total ratio = 3 + 4 = 7
Amount of yellow paint = 60
Required
Amount of red paint.
First get the total amount of paint used.
3/7 * x = 60
x is the total paint used
3x/7 = 60
3x = 7*60
x = 420/3
x = 140 buckets of paint
Amount of red paint = Total - Amount of yellow paint
Amount of red paint = 140 - 60
Amount of red paint = 80
Hence there are 80 buckets of red paint in the store
Answer:
-1,-3,-9,-27,-81,-243...
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
$ 15.00
Step-by-step explanation:
9.95 is JUST about 10
5.25 is close to 5
10 + 5 = 15
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.