1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kkurt [141]
2 years ago
12

What are benefits of socialism​

History
2 answers:
Rzqust [24]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Socialism has the greatest goal of common wealth; Since the government controls almost all of society's functions, it can make better use of resources, labors and lands; Socialism reduces disparity in wealth, not only in different areas, but also in all societal ranks and classes.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

valkas [14]2 years ago
4 0
Free health care
Explain: picture

You might be interested in
As a result of explorations by Spain, France, and England, what led to the destruction
luda_lava [24]
Disease. When Britain traveled to America, the Natives were hit with Small pox, something they couldn’t handle. The same could happen to other groups of people who do not have the right medical equipment and/or experience.
6 0
3 years ago
Do you believe that the government should have the right to limit your individual rights? Why or why not? MARK AS BRAINLIEST!
yulyashka [42]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

Yes, I do believe that the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights. Though the wording of the sentence above may sound like I'm saying I believe the government is allowed to control people, that's the last thing I mean. People need rules and structure which is what the government provides. Imagine if there <em>wasn't</em> a government. There would be no soical order because people will have too much power and some will not use their civil liberties responsibly. I understand both sides, but overall, I do think the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights.

3 0
3 years ago
Que ventajas tenía el sur
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

Being closer to home, the South was able to keep their supply lines significantly shorter than the Northern ones, and so were able to get food, ammunition, and medicine to their soldiers much more quickly than the Northern army could.

or in Spanish

Al estar más cerca de casa, el Sur pudo mantener sus líneas de suministro significativamente más cortas que las del Norte, y así pudo llevar comida, municiones y medicinas a sus soldados mucho más rápido que el ejército del Norte.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why did Loyalists want to remain part of the British Empire?
atroni [7]
The Loyalists were afraid of chaos erupting without the legal institutions of Britain. They also did not want to be separated from the commercial empire that their businesses or plantations depended upon. There was a sense of security in being part of the most powerful nation on earth. 
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
liubo4ka [24]
Northwest coast Indians you welcome
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • People who come back after having been declared dead
    5·1 answer
  • Historians use a number of tools to research their subjects. true or false
    5·1 answer
  • How did the members of the black community of montgomery, alabama try to force a change in the city’s practice of racial segrega
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Great Famine affect Europeans’ health?
    6·1 answer
  • What started the disagreement with Spain over Florida?
    11·2 answers
  • What did Patrick Henry say to American legislatures about taxes?
    11·1 answer
  • The Kansas-Nebraska Act created the
    9·1 answer
  • What are the two Atlantic sub-basins?
    5·2 answers
  • Everything both,living and nonliving,surroundings that affects an animal it is_______.
    7·2 answers
  • In 1776, most people believe that their human rights came from
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!