Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer:
MDMA (meth drug)
Explanation:
is a street drug considered a party drug. it prevent the body from reabsorbing the chemical called serotonin, making someone high
Answer:b is the answer I think.....
