1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AveGali [126]
3 years ago
14

A state owned a large natural gas field and took bids for its exploitation. The highest bid came from an interstate pipeline com

pany that distributed natural gas to providers throughout the country. A local gas company submitted the next highest bid, which included the commitment that it would pass along to local customers any savings if it was awarded the contract. The state awarded the contract to the local company. The interstate company sued to overturn this decision.
Should the interstate company prevail?
Law
1 answer:
cestrela7 [59]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant

Explanation:

The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.

As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.

You might be interested in
Hello, I am Cordelia. I died in a fire 10 years ago. Unless you send this message on to 10 other people, I will come to your roo
Anestetic [448]

Answer:

isn't this supposed to be a study app?

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.What is meant by executory consideration?A. Consideration provided by an executor.B.The exchange of consideration.Where consid
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

D, Where there is a promise to do something in the future

I hope this helped at all.

7 0
3 years ago
Voting laws are controlled by the us constitution and...
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Government

Explanation:

mark if this help

4 0
3 years ago
Describe what the chain of command is and its purpose in the investigation.
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

The exact definition for chain of command when it comes to evidence is the witnessed and written record of everyone who came in contact with the evidence and had unbroken control of it. Following the chain of command ensures that the evidence collected at the scene is the same evidence that is entered in the courtroom.

Does this help?

5 0
3 years ago
You are driving a car with a digital music player connected to the sound system. To avoid being
jeka57 [31]

Answer:

B) Only adjust the music player when your vehicle is stopped. Do not try to adjust it while driving.

plz mark me brainliest

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following are illegal drugs except?
    8·1 answer
  • Courts can issue different opinions on the same case
    13·1 answer
  • HELP PLEAE<br><br> HOW PLAY AMOG US111
    9·2 answers
  • "Democratization of rights" can best be explained as___.
    9·2 answers
  • What are two responsibilities that are only for United States citizens ?
    7·2 answers
  • Making school punishment more uniform through the zero tolerance policy was intended to:
    15·1 answer
  • Define the following
    15·1 answer
  • What is the best way to achieve good governance? Elaborate your answer.​
    10·1 answer
  • 5. Emergency Support Functions (ESF) are organized groups of?
    14·1 answer
  • (Citizenship 02.05 HC)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!