1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Morgarella [4.7K]
2 years ago
13

Negative position: Animals have no moral rights. They lack any sense of morality. They lack an understanding of their duties tow

ard others. They lack the capacity for free moral judgment.
Philosophers such as Thomas Aquinas have taught that, while human beings engage in rational thought, animals act purely on instinct. Therefore, animals do not behave morally, and they are not members of a moral community.

Since animals have no concept of morality, they are not entitled to any rights—or indeed to any moral or legal consideration at all.

Which statement would be the best rebuttal to the argument in the passage?

Why would we believe something that was written centuries ago and has never been proven?

Thomas Aquinas argues that the interests of humans and animals should not be given equal consideration.

Modern scientific studies have identified animal species that may be able to engage in rational thought.

Domesticated animals respond to training directions and cues.

Answer: Modern scientific studies have identified animal species that may be able to engage in rational thought.
i got it correct
English
1 answer:
worty [1.4K]2 years ago
5 0
That’s great !! congrats:)
You might be interested in
How does the relationship between "man and vegetable" described in paragraph five of Chapter I of Nature support
Anna [14]

Answer:

The correct answer to the given question above would be the last option. The relationship between "Man and Vegetable" by Ralph Waldo Emerson, as described in paragraph five of chapter 1 of Nature, support the piece's central idea that it suggests that the relationship between humans and nature is mystical but also unquestionable.

Explanation:

please mark me as brainlest

5 0
3 years ago
How many children did Malala's father let attend their school for free?
Komok [63]
Is that the correct question?
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lines 85–104: Explain the pacing in this section and its overall effect on the story.
ladessa [460]
"The Lottery" is a short story by Shirley Jackson, composed a very long time before its first production, on June 26, 1948. The story portrays an anecdotal residential area which sees—as do numerous different groups, both expensive and little, all through contemporary America, a yearly custom is known as "the lottery". It has been portrayed as "a standout amongst the most popular short stories ever". On the off chance that you like short, however remarkable stories, this is one of that kind.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does Wealth in the great gatsby relate to today's world
Natalija [7]
Nearly a century after its publication, F. Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby" remains a literary classic. One challenge it presents, though, is understanding how the Roaring '20s tale of Jay Gatsby's pursuit of wealth and romance at all costs is still relevant nearly a century later. The novel's portrayal of materialism, superficial relationships and the myths of fame and celebrity create remarkable parallels between Gatsby's world and the present day.

Materialism
Possessions and status are a key ingredient to many of the characters' lifestyles. In order to attract Daisy's interest, Gatsby defines himself by his enormous house, decadent parties and distinctive cars and clothing. Daisy, too, values materialism, as the convenience of her marriage to wealthy polo player Tom Buchanan keeps her from fully embracing Gatsby's vision for their future. High school English teacher David Dowling writes that America's continued obsession with materialism is one reason for the novel's permanence, depicting the conflict between moral values and the desire for wealth that still entangles people today.
8 0
2 years ago
List 4 benefits to you personally when working with a group to accomplish a project.
exis [7]

Answer:

When working in a group, you learn to work better with others. This helps in the future in any career. Also, when everyone in the group works together, the work gets done easier and faster. In a group, you must have lots of organization to know who does what. Lastly, working in a group can build a better relationship with the people you work with.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the passage
    15·1 answer
  • Choose the set of words that is an adjective clause:
    7·1 answer
  • Assignment: 01.02 Interpretations with Shakespearean Drama
    8·1 answer
  • What signals that the story is wntten using third-person
    10·2 answers
  • Read the sentence.
    12·2 answers
  • Write an essay explaining how two themes interact with one another in "The Black Cat". Your answer should be at least 250 words
    6·1 answer
  • I'll give brainliest
    14·2 answers
  • Controlling idea How does the central idea support the overall argument expressed in the controlling idea? Both men and women mu
    14·1 answer
  • Activity 2: "FIND MY OPPOSITE”
    7·1 answer
  • Argument can be structured in different ways .Provide 5 examples of an argument.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!