La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no hay opciones o incisos para responder, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
El antecedente históricos del conflicto entre Argentina y el Reino Unido con respecto a las Malvinas fue el siguiente.
Ambos países, Argentina y Gran Bretaña, reconocían a las Malvinas como su territorio. Los Ingleses afirmaban que ellos lo habían descubierto y les pertenecía. Por otro lado, Argentina decía que por su proximidad geográfica con el territorio Argentino y la lejanía de las Malvinas de Inglaterra, esas islas debían pertenecer a la Argentina.
El conflicto escaló y llegó hasta la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU), quien reconoció ese territorito como en disputa internacional.
Cabe mencionar que hasta ese momento, Gran Bretaña era quien administraba esas islas.
Por esa razón, Argentina decidió invadir las Malvinas en abril de 1982, acto que hizo que Inglaterra mandara a su flota Naval para recuperar las Malvinas.
La Marina Británica desembarcó en las islas en 21 de mayo de 1982, y se inició la guerra con la Batalla de San Carlos.
Answer:
NATURAL RESOURCES SPECIALIST
Park Ranger
Zoo Keeper
Meteorologist
Biologist
Explanation:
Self explanatory Now go finish that test!
<span>The process of objectively evaluating claims, propositions, and conclusions to determine whether they follow logically from the evidence is known as: Critical Thinking
In critical thinking, we drive our mind to see the existing evidences that available to us, and tried to linked those evidences to formulate a judgement that would determine whether the claims/propositions is true or false.
</span>
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
It is TRUE that In indonesia, the concept of pancasila, which means unity in diversity through belief in one god, nationalism, humanitarianism, democracy, and social justice, was used to try to unify the country across myriad islands and cultures.
Answer:
As is commonly accepted, the German Reich and Imperial Japan were allies in WW2. Maybe not surprisingly ,these two countries had embarked on similar ambitions at the eve of WW2, and their most important goals were to dramatically expand their sphere of influence, extend national borders by aquiring possessions from other countries and to grab hold of important resources (oil, strategic metal ores and land areas). Both countries developed a fierce nationalistic and racial code of hegemony. It followed that their adversaries were labeled as of inferior quality, and in wartime moves ,this usually carried with it contempt and harsh treatment of enemies. The Geneva code of warfare was mainly ignored by both countries. The defining element of cruelty was in the case of Nazi Germany, a monstrous master plan for the annihilation of the Jews. Which was also implemented on a gruesome scale. This appears to have no actual connection to the German war effort. Similarly, actions taken by Imperial Japan against the Chinese, bears the same mark of cruelty, if not in level or planned implementation (or motives) as with the German persecution of the Jews. Nevertheless, ruthlessness on an almost unprecedented scale was used against what was seen as the racially inferior , prisoners of war and occupied nations.
