True. it was 4 days after he died
<span>No. Initially you
gain riches from the resources found in those territories and yes you extend
your sphere of influence farther and with it your power increases. Still.
Eventually there will come a time when the people of those lands will
rise up and demand independence. Through
peaceful means at first but if not, they will resort to conflict that will be
costly on both sides. Then it will all
boil down to whether you want to hold on or release your hold on that
territory. If you hold on, they will more determined to break free from that
hold. That you gain something through war means you will lose it through war if you don't want to let go.</span>
Private ownership entails the existence of an owner/propietor, who has important economic incentives for the preservation of the value of his property and even for enhacing its future value. This occurs to a greater extent when private ownership takes place in countries with strong institutions that are able to enforce property rights if necessary.
On the other hand, when collective property forms are used instead, economists tend to forecast that it will be affected by the process known as the Tragedy of the Commons. It describes how when there is a shared resource, individual users who have access to it and use it in accordance to their own interest, end up behaving in a manner that is harmful for the common property, even tough this is contrary to their personal interests too, as then the common good will not be in the same initial conditions anymore. For example, overexploitation due to unlimited grazing on a collectively-owned field.
That is true. Scholars estimate that between half and three quarters of the colonist came as indentured servants
A promise of being free is:
Being able to make decisions for yourself.
Not being "owned" by another person.
also being able to speak, think, or act without restraint.
