Which of these is NOT human capital?

Which one of the following is not an assumption of the EOQ model? Decisions for one item can be made independently of decisions

irga5000 [103]

Answer:

Quantity discounts can be taken advantage of for large lot sizes.

Explanation:

The EOQ model assumptions:

the order of one item does not intervene with the other.

The order will arrive without delay and with a specific amount of goods.

no losses or damage in transit

The EOQ does not consider the discount for large lot size, their formula does not consider the value of the goods:

$Q_{opt} = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{H}}$

Its use: Demand of the good

cost of Setup, or ordering cost.

and Holding cost, the cost of keeping the inventory

There is no variable to account for discounts for order size in this method

7 0

3 years ago

Tara purchased a machine for $40,000 to be used in her business. The cost recovery allowed and allowable for the three years the

nexus9112 [7]

Answer:

c. $11,480

Explanation:

Given that

Cost recovery allowed Cost recovery allowable

Year 1 $16,000 $8,000

Year 2 $9,600 $12,800

Year 3 $5,760 $7,680

The computation of gain should Tara recognize is shown below:-

Cost $40,000

Less:

Greater cost of recovery

allowable or allowed

Year 1 $16,000

Year 2 $12,800

Year 3 $7,680 $36,480

Adjusted basis $3,520

Gain to be recognized = Residual value - Adjusted basis

= $15,000 - $3,520

= $11,480

So, for computing the gain to be recognized we simply deduct the adjust basis from residual value.

7 0

4 years ago

Bronco Electronics' current assets consist of cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, and inventories. The following d

Marina CMI [18]

Explanation:

a. Current assets = $600000

Current ratio = 3

Current ratio = Current assets ÷Current liabilities = 3

⇒Current assets = 3 Current liabilities

Given that

Quick ratio = 2.25

Also we know that

Quick assets = Quick assets / Current liabilities = 2.25

therefore, Quick assets = 2.25 Current liabilities

Also, Quick assets = Current assets - Inventory

then,

2.25 current liabilities = 3 Current liabilities - $150000

⇒$150000 = 0.75 Current liabilities

Hence, Current liabilities = $200000

Current assets = 3 Current liabilities

= 3 × $200000

= $600000.

b. Calculating for Shareholders equity we get

Shareholders equity = $560000

We know that ,

Total debt + Total equity = Total assets

Debt to equity ratio = 1.5

Also, Total debt / Shareholders equity = 1.5

Debt = 1.5 Shareholders equity

1.5 Shareholders equity + 1 Equity = $1400000

2.5 Shareholders equity = $1400000

Shareholders equity = $560000.

Now calculating for Non current assests

c. Non Current assets = $800000

Total assets = Current assets + Non current assets

$1400000 = $600000 + Non current assets

Non current assets = $800000.

d. Long term liabilities = $640000.

Total assets = Total liabilities + Shareholders equity

$1400000 = Current liabilities + Long term liabilities + Shareholders equity

$1400000 = $200000 + Long term liabilities + $560000

Long term liabilities = $640000.

7 0

4 years ago

A domestic corporation considering expanding into international markets for the first time will typically

Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

They'll consider implementing a low risk/low control strategy such as exporting.

7 0

3 years ago

Jamie purchased a 50% general partnership interest in Partnership M for $40,000 in Year 1. To finance operations, Partnership M

klio [65]

Answer:

$90,000

Explanation:

Calculation to determine what Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses is:

Using this formula

Risk limitation on losses=[Partnership M +(General partnership interest× Recourse debt agreement)]

Let plug in the formula

Risk limitation on losses= [$40,000 + (50% × $100,000)]

Risk limitation on losses=($40,000+$50,000)

Risk limitation on losses=$90,000

Therefore Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses is:$90,000 and the reason why Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses was the amount of $90,000 was because of his share of the recourse debt of the amount of $100,000 as well as the cash amount of $40,000 he invested.

4 0

3 years ago