1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatuchka [14]
2 years ago
13

CAN SOME DO THIS ASSIGNMENT ITS ABOUT ABOUT "Was the United States Justified in Going to War With Mexico?" WRITE THEM IN PARAGRA

PHS AND INCLUDE THE PROMPT PLEASE
History
1 answer:
OLEGan [10]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Brainliest please

Explanation:

The United States was justified in going to war because Mexico had exfoliate American blood on American soil, Texas (a land that numerous Mexicans still considered theirs) was an independent democracy and had the right to govern itself, and Texas was trying to come part of the United States, which means that the United States.

During 1846-1848, Mexico and the United States were mooting over whether Texas and California was Mexico's home or America's home.. The United States was unjustified in going into war with Mexico because President JamesK. Polk provoked it, the thievery of land, and the slavery expansion.

You might be interested in
Ayuda porfa con esta tarea
swat32

Answer: sorry i dont know spanish . . .

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How did Renaissance humanists differ from medieval thinkers?
Ket [755]

Answer:

Humanists thought that the purpose of learning was self-improvement not preparation for religious life.

Explanation:

They were interested in inquiry and exploration, as well as the idea that humans could perfect themselves.

Medieval scholars focused on god and faith. Renaissance scholars were more interested in human beings and the world.

4 0
4 years ago
Which Spanish conqueror is not accurately matched with the area he explored or conquered? A. Francisco Vasquez de Coronado - wes
GaryK [48]
I think the answer is D
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which action by the state of Maryland to McCulloch v. Maryland?
erma4kov [3.2K]

The action by the state of Maryland which led to McCulloch v. Maryland was that it attempted to stop a branch of the Second Bank of the United States from bringing in notes that were not made in Maryland, as they were taxed if they were from out of state.

This case led to the necessary and proper clause being used and is one of the most famous Supreme Court cases in the history of the United States.

8 0
4 years ago
What is the president of congo DRC?
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

Félix Tshisekedi

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Qwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
    14·1 answer
  • Laborers who came to be known as Untouchable were a subclass of A. Brahmins. B. kshatriyas. C. Vaishyas. D. shudra.
    9·1 answer
  • Given what you know about that time period, how do you think the Catholic Church ruled in Galileos case? Why?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a major trade route built by Native Americans in Mississippi?
    13·2 answers
  • Explain why the decline in population was so harmful to the Roman Empire
    11·1 answer
  • Why did people believe in communism?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which view best summarizes Lincoln's position on slavery in 1858
    11·1 answer
  • Pleaseee help! Easy 10 points
    6·1 answer
  • How did Muslim scholars help spread knowledge during the Scientific Revolution?
    11·2 answers
  • Which two factors made farming possible in Mesopotamia
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!