The correct answer is Imaginary audience.
Adolescence is a stage of development and transition towards adult life, which is characterized by an accelerated growth rate. During its development, neurological, cognitive and socioemotional changes occur, in addition to physical and sexual maturation. All of these experiences include the transition to social and economic independence, the development of identity, an increase in self-centeredness, the acquisition of the skills necessary to establish relationships in groups and the practice of roles.
Egocentrism during adolescence manifests itself through several cognitive and emotional phenomena such as the personal fable, the imaginary audience and the feeling of invulnerability:
The personal fable is a story that teenagers tell themselves, based on the conviction that their personal experience is special and unique.
Imaginary audience: When, unrealistically, teenagers consider that others pay as much attention to their appearance and conduct as themselves.
The feeling of invulnerability is a cognitive distortion that could underlie the risky behaviors that some adolescents engage in, thinking that the most likely consequences of such behaviors cannot happen to them because they are special.
Through a group of equals, teenagers learn to put into perspective and to relativize what is happening to them, as well as the emotional intensity it produces.
<span>1. What are some conflicts or issues surrounding immigration and multiculturalism in the U.S. and the world?
</span>Some conflicts or issues surrounding immigration and multiculturalism in the U.S. and the world are determined by fears and prejudice around immigration, and some true facts about the economy and social changes. The main issues that many countries have are that either there is supposedly not space for everyone, or that immigrants do not add value to the population.<span>
Can these issues be resolved?
Of course, they could be resolved. It is a complex problem, but first and foremost we have to address the cause of the migration and understand the motive of these people. Then, we can find solutions appropriate for everyone. As for multiculturalism, only education can help us understand that mixing culture is a plus value, not the contrary.
Why or why not?
Because it is a problem that is not going away if we do not anything, it will become only worse. So, it is appropriate to sit and think about what we can do to properly address the issue in a way that works for everyone. Just reject this issue is not going to solve the problem as well, solutions come from understanding.
2. Migration significantly changes populations.
Migration historically changes populations, as people from different culture live together tradition, language, and everything that make a population unique change as different elements shapes together. The most adequate example is perhaps language, as today American, while remaining English, as some forms that derives straight from past migration. </span>
Answer:
ok
Explanation:
freed african american slaves from in both union and confedirancy
Answer: This isn't really understood, because not all societies formed governments in the sense of western hierarchical systems, and not all governments formed under the same conditions. It is one of those mysteries, which means it was a gradual thing, and not a sudden seasonal change from anarchy to government. The first government accumulated within a group of people who spoke the same language, and there was some pressure on them that required some level of organization for the distribution of resources and labor, so it seems, but even as I write this I know that is far too simple.
For thousands of years it was believed there was a natural hegemony bestowed by divine power, then, there was the American Revolution and the idea of government was turned upside down. Following that was Karl Marx, who suggested that government was a mechanism of oppression to control the means of production and wealth accumulation, but all of the hypotheses built from this idea, which most of modern thinking can find some degree of lineage to, are problematic to be nice, and outright failures at the other extreme.
Quick answer is, there are a thousand answers, none of which have proven to be universal, so they are only partially right.
There is a lot of room for research in this area.
