People's point of view can change to suit changes in historical context. The conclusion that U.S attitudes toward panama canal during the 20th century support the opinion that people's point of view can change depending on the historical context
Answer:
It accused automakers of failing to make cars as safe as possible
Explanation:
Explanation:
Cost Benefit Analyses are basically pro-con lists. A person wanting to make a complex decision will analyze the costs of the decision and the benefits of the decision and weigh them against each other.
Yellow journalism is basically people exaggerating. In simpler words, it is a newspaper (such and such) that contains no real information behind the story that is being given to the person reading it. Nowadays, the Internet can be an example of yellow journalism. People post things that are not true or have no evidence behind it. The summary is, is that yellow journalism is something where journalists say/write/do to trick people into thinking a certain story is true without any real facts.
What is the context? Is this a question about a book?
