it is similar because ponyboy has to fight a war of his own from having to hide out with Johnny to his death and many more things in between
Julius Caesar was a great military general who, after having been removed from his governorship of Gaul by the Roman senate, staged a coup and took control of Rome by force, the person with whom he was once aligned to take control of the empire. Although he is often portrayed as a tyrannical dictator, Julius Caesar was somewhat of a champion of the people. He eliminated the heavy taxes levied on farmers and granted any Roman citizen with three or more sons land. He also made the dealings of the Roman senate public by posting an account of them for the public to read and realigned the Roman calendar to coincide with the seasons. He also declared himself ruler for life.
Since his lineage could be traced to the founding of Rome, the role of the Caesars came to be associated with the role of the gods, who had more power than senators in the eyes of Romans. All of these actions infuriated the senate, which felt that he had compromised its power. This ultimately led to the senate attack on Julius Caesar that killed him.
Answer:
So first he decided to remain in South Africa to begin a campaign against the legislation to basically give Indians the right to vote. He then formed a group called the Natal Indian Congress. Soon in 1906, the Transvaal Government wanted to restrict the rights of Indians even more. So, Gandhi organized his very first campaign of mass civil disobedience or whats called satyagraha. This protest lasted several years and finally, he and the South African Government came to a compromise. In 1914 he returned to India to live there and was even supporting Britain in the first world war. But in 1919 he did another mass civil disobedience because Britain made it mandatory to draft Indians in the military. A lot of people supported this protest and by 1920 he was the leader of the Indian movement for independent.
( If this sounds wrong or is wrong then I am very sorry but I think this is right I also did put this in my own words)
Explanation:
Contrary to the situation 50 years ago, a candidate's party affiliation has become <em><u>less important </u></em>in comparison to their attention to the public and governmental views and ideals.
The elections which took place 50 years ago were often greatly influenced by party identification, regardless of the candidates being presented. <em><u>Party identification </u></em>is the concept of loyalty to a political party despite the candidate representing it. Voters would agree with the overall views of the party and vote accordingly, without taking into account the individual views of the candidate, which made decision-making for voting easier.
This is in contrast to today, where political candidates no longer need to fully depend on the political party to which they are affiliated. This is due to the increase in <em><u>marketing, propaganda, and overall communication technology in the past 50 years.</u></em>
The advances we have today make it possible for candidates to transmit their views and ideas to the public and allow voters to make decisions based on the beliefs of individual candidates as opposed to voting for a party and hoping the candidate performs according to those views.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/9929817?referrer=searchResults
The Liberator was started by William Lloyd Garrison as the first abolitionist newspaper in 1831. While colonial North America received few slaves compared to other places in the Western Hemisphere, it was deeply involved in the slave trade and the first protests against slavery were efforts to end the slave trade
