Answer:
Both 10 and 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helpsss
No the answer is -13. Please mark me brainliest!
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202
Sample size n=40
Level of significane alpha = 0.01
Create null and alternate hypothesis as:
H0: r=0
Ha: r not equal 0
(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)
Sample r = 0.202
r difference = 0.202
test statistic t = 
df =n-2 =38
t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704
Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Answer:
89°
Step-By-Step Explanation:
<WYT is the angle 4
<UYW is the angle 5
since angle 4 and 5 are on the same line and
anngle 4 is 91°,
180° - 91° = 89°
This shows that <UYW is 89°
<em><u>If this helped, please consider picking this answer as the Brainliest Answer. Thank you!</u></em>
Answer:
The volume is 25cm
Step-by-step explanation: