Answer:
b. $1.87
Explanation:
Number of order taking costs = $20,592
Number of orders = 187,200
Cost of activity
= $20,592 ÷ 187,200
= $0.11
The Statement of overhead allocated is given below:-
Number of orders = 17
Cost per activity = $0.11
Cost
= 17 × $0.11
= $1.87
Therefore, the overhead is applied to the Tucker family account for order taking costs $1.87
Opportunity cost of going to college is actually the salary forgone.
With a yearly salary of $15,000 and a rent of $12000 yearly (parents would not let you live at home), we are left with $15000 - $12000 = $3000 per year
For 4 years, the opportunity cost will be 4 x $3000 = $12000
Answer:
total taxable income = $73,000
tax liability = $7,505
Explanation:
Clarice's ordinary income $30,000
Clarice's capital gains:
- selling of stock = $34,000 - $16,000 = $18,000
- selling of coin collection = $55,000 - $30,000 = $25,000
- total long term capital gains = $43,000
Clarice's taxable income = $73,000
Clarice's ordinary income tax rate 2011:
ordinary income = $30,000 - standard deduction $5,800 = $24,200
- 10% on taxable income from $0 to $8,500 = $850
- 15% on taxable income over $8,500 to $34,500 = $2,355
ordinary income taxes = $3,205
Clarice's capital gains tax rate 2011 = 10%
capital gains taxes = $43,000 x 10% = $4,300
total tax liability = $7,505
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
