1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena55 [62]
2 years ago
14

Please Answer Quickly

History
1 answer:
Helga [31]2 years ago
5 0


1) Nicaragua
2) Brazil
3) Mexico
4) Argentina
You might be interested in
What do you think about the guardianship policy that was in Saudi Arabia? Please write 4 sentences or more explaining the policy
Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer:

In my opinion, I think that it is unfair to the women in Saudi Arabia because they have to depend on a man to make decisions. Not just that, this policy happens for the woman's whole life. I think that women should have an open mindset and make decisions just like men. They should be seen as equal and not distinct just because of different body parts. This stereotype in my opinion is very wrong because we are all equal and same no matter what gender.  

3 0
2 years ago
What are some positive and negative effects of migration?
Alona [7]
<span>Cons
</span>Depression of wages may occur but this seems to be temporary.
Having workers willing to work for relatively low pay may allow employers to ignore productivity, training and innovation.
Migrants may be exploited.
Increases in population can put pressure on public services.
Unemployment may rise if there are unrestricted numbers of incomers.
There may be integration difficulties and friction with local people.<span>Positive
</span>Job vacancies and skills gaps can be filled.
Economic growth can be sustained.
Services to an ageing population can be maintained when there are insufficient young people locally.
<span>The pension gap can be filled by the contributions of new young workers and they also pay taxes.
</span><span>Pros
</span>Job vacancies and skills gaps can be filled.
Economic growth can be sustained.
Services to an ageing population can be maintained when there are insufficient young people locally.
The pension gap can be filled by the contributions of new young workers and they also pay taxes.
Immigrants bring energy and innovation.
<span>Host countries are enriched by cultural diversity.</span><span>



</span>
4 0
2 years ago
THE REASONS FOR LOW PARTICIPATION IN GLOBAL MERCHANDISE TRADES<br> AMONG AFRICAN ECONOMIES
melamori03 [73]

Answer:

Mark me as brainlist

Explanation:

Even though global trade has fluctuated over the years, it has also rapidly increased. However, the structure and pattern of trade vary significantly by-products and regions. Undoubtedly, trade has come with both benefits and daunting challenges to countries involved, especially in African nations, where primary and intermediate merchandise formed a substantial share of exports. Because advanced and newly industrialized economies have better technology and know-how, manufacturing industries, access to finance, and market than Africa, they have a greater market proportion in the world trade. Arguably, African countries have been left in the cold as they struggle to compete with advanced economies. As presented in this chapter, Africa has been struggling to be relevant in the world market. However, its global share of merchandise trade has reduced over the decades. This is partly because the continent has concentrated on the exportation of few primary commodities (i.e., mineral fuels, iron ores, gold, cocoa beans) with volatile prices and demand in the global markets. The frequent global oil crunch other raw products are a wake-up call for a rapid industrialization and diversification for competitiveness in Africa. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has to ensure that defensive trade remedies should not be the next frontier of protectionism. Finally, for trade, growth, and development to be stimulated, African countries should urgently open their markets to expand intra-African trade.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did British colonists oppose the Wool Act of 1699 and the Iron Act of 1750? They protected the home country’s economy at the
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

<u><em>They protected the home country’s economy at the colonists’ expense</em></u>.

Explanation:

Interestingly this colonist where affected after the Wool Act because it resulted in higher value of British clothes as a result of export ban of foreign wool.

The Iron Act which was meant to increase local iron production was opposed because they were resulting in losses for the growing iron and steel companies.

4 0
3 years ago
Hitler and Lenin rose in power by
grin007 [14]
I believe it's A: capitalizing on the harsh post-war conditions in their countries.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain the importance of a fire during the Neolithic age
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Enlightenment affect the political attitudes of colonists?
    7·1 answer
  • Which tribe used only route to get to the Indian territory?
    10·1 answer
  • Which length of time is a decade?
    13·1 answer
  • The Jumanos hunted all of the following animals except:
    10·2 answers
  • How did European christian <br> view of infidels lead to the crusades?
    14·2 answers
  • A. is it an accurate title for the time period?
    7·1 answer
  • Anybody know this one?
    12·2 answers
  • Which place name best completes the diagram ?
    5·2 answers
  • Why is my dad still getting milk (its been 13 years im 14)
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!