Answer:
The answer is stated below:
Explanation:
If the SEC and the AICPA, worked altogether in order to share the information, they might have detected the fraud prior. The case states that the Madoff Securities does not required to submit the peer review program to AICPA as Friehling, had recorded that he did not perform or conduct any audits.
Recommendation
1. The policy execution for the exchange of the information among the two firms would be useful to detect the fraud.
2. The PCAOB should spend more resources an attending the hotline of whistle blowing through executing the policies which need certain complaints to be addressed effectively.
3. The firms or company should have done more in order to verify the financial statements assertions, which surrounds the investments. The PCAOB need to execute the policy that require the companies (such as Madoff Securities) to correctly answer the inquiries of the auditor.
Answer:
e. exists when a single seller experiences lower average total costs than any potential competitor.
Explanation:
A monopoly is a market structure which is typically characterized by a single-seller who sells a unique product in the market by dominance. This ultimately implies that, it is a market structure wherein the seller has no competitor because he is solely responsible for the sale of unique products without close substitutes. Any individual that deals with the sales of unique products in a monopolistic market is generally referred to as a monopolist.
For example, a public water supply company is an example of a monopoly because they serve as the only source of water provider to the general public in a society.
A natural monopoly exists when a single seller experiences lower average total costs than any potential competitor because of the very high start-up or initial cost and economy of scale.
Answer:
Required return for Savitz: 10.95%
Explanation:
<u>Considering the gordon model we have to solve for the cost of capital (Ke)</u>
D1 2.08
P 42
g 0.06
Ke 0.10952381
Answer:
<u>lower return </u>
Explanation:
an additionl unit of capital will have a <u>lower return</u> in Alpha compared to Beta
The diminishing return theory explains that if a factor is added, while the other remains the same, the return for each additional quantity added will be lower. So if both countries have the same amount of factor, Alpha adding more capital will not have the same return as doing it in Beta
ΔCapital/(40,000 + labor + land) < ΔCapital/(5,000 + labor + land)
That's because the divisor ir greater in Alpha it is required a higher amount of capital to produce the same return.