Answer:
The transformational leaders are bureaucratic and charismatic are people oriented in nature.
Explanation:
- The charismatic leaders are also called as the transformational leaders and shares various things.
- Charismatic leaders make their status better and transformational leaders focus on the transformation of the organization's vision. The main difference is the focus and the audience.
- The charismatic leaders are committed and have engaging personalities like martin Luther king as his speeches were often more tangible than other leaders and used to have a huge influence on the people he met.
- The charismatic leaders are more emotionally attached to their audience. They work towards an emphasis on the greater good. More people-oriented.
Answer:
The correct answer is b) Be able to use his or her skills.
Explanation:
Melanie Gollick believes that employees must be able to develop and use their skills to perform work in the hospital. But the use of these skills will depend on the personality of each person and the way they adapt to carry out group work.
Skills refer to a set of skills that each person presents, this ability may be different for each person, for example, a person who works in the health area in a hospital needs to be among their skills, work under pressure, follow instructions, empathy, adaptation, group work, among others.
<em />
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
B) Decreased $138 million
Explanation:
To determine the effects of long term debt accounts on HP's total cash flow form financing we can use the following formula:
HP's cash flow from financing = new shares issued - shares repurchased - dividend payments + cash flows related to long term debt account + income from other financing activities
-$6,077 = $0 -$5,241 -$894 + X + $196
-$6,077 = -$5,939 + X
-$138 = X
HP's long term debt accounts decreased by $138
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
The principle that's illustrated by the gas tax is known as the benefit received principle.
<h3>What's a tax?</h3>
It should be noted that a tax is a compulsory payment that generate revenue to the government.
In this case, a gas tax imposed by some states in which those who use the roads more pay more to maintain them is based on the benefits received principle.
Learn more about tax on:
brainly.com/question/25783927
