You should search up the answer online it usually pops up the answer.
This caste system put people at a higher form than others, with the highest on the caste system being able to come back as another high form or ascend. Brainliest please.
Answer:
Fifty years ago my friends and I had a party where we read and toasted each of the 95 theses so at one point I certainly read ’em all, though granted the effect of all those shots, I don’t recall the higher numbered ones very well. In any case, don’t think the theses, which are focused on indulgences, are a very clear statement of Luther’s theology. After all, in 1517, Luther didn’t realize he was instigating the Reformation; and the full statement of salvation by faith alone and the rest came later. What made the Theses matter wasn’t doctrinal. One of the major factors in the Reformation was resentment of the financial burden the Roman church put on the German people—the indulgences were sold to finance the building of Saint Peter’s cathedral. Whatever purely religious motives the German princes had in supporting Luther’s rebellion, they definitely liked the idea of not shipping money off to Rome. The prospect of secularizing the monasteries was mighty welcome as well. No princely support, no Reformation.
or
I’m definitely going for thesis 62 — “The true treasure of the church, is the most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God”
Rome and the Reformers both taught that a man is justified by God’s work of grace, but, it is all important to see the real contrast between the Roman and the Reformation faiths. ROME taught — justification by God’s work of grace in man emphasizing the work of God in us and our co-operation with that work.
The REFORMATION — taught that man is Justified by God’s work of grace in Christ, emphasizing what God does for us in Christ, without our co-operation.
Explanation:
that^^
Answer: The Scramble for Africa, also called the Partition of Africa,
Answer:
I believe that the answer is B. Cotton farmers grew rich because France paid higher prices than those paid by the North.
Explanation: The Civil War affected the Southern economy by 1815, cotton was the most valuable export in the United States; by 1840, it was worth more than all of the other exports combined. But, while the Southern states produced two- thirds of the world's supply of cotton, the South had little manufacturing capability, about 29 percent of the railroad tracks, and only about 13 percent of the nation's banks. The South did experiment with using slave labor in manufacturing, but for the most part it was well satisfied with its agricultural economy. The North, by contrast, was well on its way toward a commercial and manufacturing economy, which would have a direct impact on its war making abilities. By 1860, 90 percent of the nation's manufacturing output came from Northern states. The North produced 17 times more cotton than in the South. Other Northern industries such as weapons, manufacturing, leather goods, iron production, textiles, grew and improved as the war progressed. But, the same was not true in the South. The twin disadvantages of a smaller industrial economy and having so much of the war fought in the South hampered Confederate growth and development. Southern farmers (including cotton growers) were hampered in their ability to sell their goods overseas due to Union naval blockades. Union invasions into the South resulted in the capture of Southern transportation and manufacturing facilities.
