The "State of the state speech" was given by governor Nathan Deal. One metaphor that the governor used in his "State of the state speech" is: “Over the past seven years, we have endeavored to plant whole orchards of opportunity, some of which will not bear their largest fruits until those who come after us are sitting where you sit now.” This metaphor was used as a comparison of policies to seedlings which require love and care to take root.
Answer:
1.Christopher Columbus was a fraud.2. He was indeed a brave and prolific explorer. 3.but he also was a brutal evil man who never even made it to the place that is now the United States.4. We all believe that Columbus is a villain than a hero.
5.First of all, according to Wikipedia, A hero (masculine) or heroine (feminine) is a person or main character of a literary work who, in the face of danger, combats adversity through feats of ingenuity, bravery or strength, often sacrificing their own personal concerns for a greater good. However, based on what we have learned about Christopher Columbus, what he did has nothing to do with the definition of hero. His motivation to take the travel was to arrive in India, a country in east Asia, to obtain gold. From this perspective, his motivation was not noble. In addition, he did not arrive in India.
Secondly, he set a bad example to colonists came later. According to the article “Christopher Columbus: Hero or Murderer?” by Whitney DeWitt, it is said that “Columbus’s arrogance and exploitation regarding slavery began on his second voyage. Ferdinand and Isabella had ordered that the natives be treated kindly. In opposition to this order, Columbus began exporting slaves in great numbers in 1494.” His way to treat the native residents was improper and rude, which is bad model to colonists who came later. A hero is supposed to be a decent man who get rid of bad reputation. Columbus’ behavior did not conform to the standard.
Because of the reasons given above, it will be hard to classify Christopher Columbus as a hero. His motivation to come to American continent was not noble. He set a bad example to colonists who came later. In addition, his arrival caused a catastrophe to local residents. Therefore, he is more like a villain than a hero.
brainliest plz
Yes, it is true that in general the Northeast was the region most opposed to the annexation of Texas, since this would have meant an expansion of Southern power, which many in the Northeast wanted to avoid.
Answer:
Hope this helps
Explanation:
think one of the major themes that Douglass is trying to illustrate is that Ignorance is used as a means to perpetuate slavery. You can read about it at the GradeSaver link below. There are many things Douglass relates about this time period. There is the historical context of slavery. He relates Christianity's link with slavery in both a good context as well as the bad. He relates the number of slaves on plantations as well as the haunting melodies of the slaves as they traversed the forests and worked the fields.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
Stalin failed to act quickly on promises to help the U.S., according to the agreements reached during the Yalta Conference and later in the Potsdam Conference. However, the United States also failed to do things agreed upon during the conferences. Of course, both nations have their own sides of the story. The real thing was that these series of disagreements contributed to mistrust between the nations.
During the so-called Cold War years, the Soviet Union remained in control of Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, and Hungary. Stalin considered these countries as a buffer in case the western allies tried to invade the Soviet Union.
The Cold War years was a time in which the United States and teh Soviet Union competed in the arms race, the space race, and in spreading/contain Communism in the world. These generated so many conflicts and wars around the world.
