1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adelina 88 [10]
3 years ago
12

Find the equation of a line parallel to y=3x−6that passes through the point (1,-5).

Mathematics
1 answer:
k0ka [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: here answer give brainlist -2 ,5

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
(I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST)
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

A triangle must have three angles that add up to 180 degrees.

40 + 70 + 65 = 175, which is not 180, so it cannot create a triangle.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The larger angle measures?<br> The smaller angle measures?
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

Larger angle: 104 degrees

Smaller angle: 76 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

(9x+5) + (6x+10) = 180

x = 11

5 0
3 years ago
What is the distance between -45 and 65
tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

110

Step-by-step explanation:

What is the Difference between -45 and +65? In other words, what is the Difference between negative 45 and positive 65?

To solve this math problem, start by picturing a horizontal number line that starts with negative infinity on the left and ends with positive infinity on the right:

∞ ..... -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3, .... ∞

The Difference between -45 and +65 is the distance between -45 and +65 on our number line above. Thus, the Difference between two numbers will always be a positive number.

It is a two-step process to calculate the Difference between -45 and +65. Step 1 is to subtract +65 from -45, and Step 2 is to find the absolute value of the Step 1 answer. Here is the math to illustrate better:

(-45) - (+65) = -110

|-110| = 110

That's it! The Difference between -45 and +65 is as follows:

110

5 0
3 years ago
Let and be differentiable vector fields and let a and b be arbitrary real constants. Verify the following identities.
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

The given identities are verified by using operations of the del operator such as divergence and curl of the given vectors.

<h3>What are the divergence and curl of a vector field?</h3>

The del operator is used for finding the divergence and the curl of a vector field.

The del operator is given by

\nabla=\^i\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\^j \frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\^k\frac{\partial}{\partial z}

Consider a vector field F=x\^i+y\^j+z\^k

Then the divergence of the vector F is,

div F = \nabla.F = (\^i\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\^j \frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\^k\frac{\partial}{\partial z}).(x\^i+y\^j+z\^k)

and the curl of the vector F is,

curl F = \nabla\times F = \^i(\frac{\partial Fz}{\partial y}- \frac{\partial Fy}{\partial z})+\^j(\frac{\partial Fx}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial Fz}{\partial x})+\^k(\frac{\partial Fy}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial Fx}{\partial y})

<h3>Calculation:</h3>

The given vector fields are:

F1 = M\^i + N\^j + P\^k and F2 = Q\^i + R\^j + S\^k

1) Verifying the identity: \nabla.(aF1+bF2)=a\nabla.F1+b\nabla.F2

Consider L.H.S

⇒ \nabla.(aF1+bF2)

⇒ \nabla.(a(M\^i + N\^j + P\^k) + b(Q\^i + R\^j + S\^k))

⇒ \nabla.((aM+bQ)\^i+(aN+bR)\^j+(aP+bS)\^k)

⇒ (\^i\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\^j \frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\^k\frac{\partial}{\partial z}).((aM+bQ)\^i+(aN+bR)\^j+(aP+bS)\^k)

Applying the dot product between these two vectors,

⇒ \frac{\partial (aM+bQ)}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial (aN+bR)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial (aP+bS)}{\partial z} ...(1)

Consider R.H.S

⇒ a\nabla.F1+b\nabla.F2

So,

\nabla.F1=(\^i\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\^j \frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\^k\frac{\partial}{\partial z}).(M\^i + N\^j + P\^k)

⇒ \nabla.F1=\frac{\partial M}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial N}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial P}{\partial z}

\nabla.F2=(\^i\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\^j \frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\^k\frac{\partial}{\partial z}).(Q\^i + R\^j + S\^k)

⇒ \nabla.F1=\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial R}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial S}{\partial z}

Then,

a\nabla.F1+b\nabla.F2=a(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial N}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial P}{\partial z})+b(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial R}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial S}{\partial z})

⇒ \frac{\partial (aM+bQ)}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial (aN+bR)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial (aP+bS)}{\partial z} ...(2)

From (1) and (2),

\nabla.(aF1+bF2)=a\nabla.F1+b\nabla.F2

2) Verifying the identity: \nabla\times(aF1+bF2)=a\nabla\times F1+b\nabla\times F2

Consider L.H.S

⇒ \nabla\times(aF1+bF2)

⇒ (\^i\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\^j \frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\^k\frac{\partial}{\partial z})\times(a(M\^i+N\^j+P\^k)+b(Q\^i+R\^j+S\^k))

⇒ (\^i\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\^j \frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\^k\frac{\partial}{\partial z})\times ((aM+bQ)\^i+(aN+bR)\^j+(aP+bS)\^k)

Applying the cross product,

\^i(\^k\frac{\partial (aP+bS)}{\partial y}- \^j\frac{\partial (aN+bR)}{\partial z})+\^j(\^i\frac{\partial (aM+bQ)}{\partial z}-\^k\frac{\partial (aP+bS)}{\partial x})+\^k(\^j\frac{\partial (aN+bR)}{\partial x}-\^i\frac{\partial (aM+bQ)}{\partial y}) ...(3)

Consider R.H.S,

⇒ a\nabla\times F1+b\nabla\times F2

So,

a\nabla\times F1=a(\nabla\times (M\^i+N\^j+P\^k))

⇒ \^i(\frac{\partial aP\^k}{\partial y}- \frac{\partial aN\^j}{\partial z})+\^j(\frac{\partial aM\^i}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial aP\^k}{\partial x})+\^k(\frac{\partial aN\^j}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial aM\^i}{\partial y})

a\nabla\times F2=b(\nabla\times (Q\^i+R\^j+S\^k))

⇒ \^i(\frac{\partial bS\^k}{\partial y}- \frac{\partial bR\^j}{\partial z})+\^j(\frac{\partial bQ\^i}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial bS\^k}{\partial x})+\^k(\frac{\partial bR\^j}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial bQ\^i}{\partial y})

Then,

a\nabla\times F1+b\nabla\times F2 =

\^i(\^k\frac{\partial (aP+bS)}{\partial y}- \^j\frac{\partial (aN+bR)}{\partial z})+\^j(\^i\frac{\partial (aM+bQ)}{\partial z}-\^k\frac{\partial (aP+bS)}{\partial x})+\^k(\^j\frac{\partial (aN+bR)}{\partial x}-\^i\frac{\partial (aM+bQ)}{\partial y})

...(4)

Thus, from (3) and (4),

\nabla\times(aF1+bF2)=a\nabla\times F1+b\nabla\times F2

Learn more about divergence and curl of a vector field here:

brainly.com/question/4608972

#SPJ4

Disclaimer: The given question on the portal is incomplete.

Question: Let F1 = M\^i + N\^j + P\^k and F2 = Q\^i + R\^j + S\^k be differential vector fields and let a and b arbitrary real constants. Verify the following identities.

1)\nabla.(aF1+bF2)=a\nabla.F1+b\nabla.F2\\2)\nabla\times(aF1+bF2)=a\nabla\times F1+b\nabla\times F2

8 0
2 years ago
An economist studying fuel costs wants to estimate the mean price of gasoline in her state on a certain day. On that day, she ta
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

($2.19,$2.39)

Step-by-step explanation:

khan

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Multiplicitave inverse of 3/5
    12·1 answer
  • What is the volume of a rectangular prism with the dimensions: base 3 1 2 cm, height 1 1 2 cm, and length 5 1 2 cm?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the perimeter of 2m 10cm by 45cm
    8·2 answers
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST TO CORRECT ANSWER
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELPPPP IM SOOOOOOO CONFUSED<br><br> ++YOU GET MANY POINTS++
    6·1 answer
  • Please help lol. 15 point!
    15·2 answers
  • Using the information given, select the statement that can deduce the line segments to be parallel. If there are none, then sele
    5·1 answer
  • 6)
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP y= 1/2 x - 3
    6·1 answer
  • Rephrase verbally in equivalent only if, sufficient, necessary, contrapositive and unless form: ”if we had an FTL drive, then we
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!