Answer: E. Never
geometric average return can NEVER exceed the arithmetic average return for a given set of returns
Explanation:
The arithmetic average return is always higher than the other average return measure called the geometric average return. The arithmetic return ignores the compounding effect and order of returns and it is misleading when the investment returns are volatile.
Arithmetic returns are the everyday calculation of the average. You take the series of returns (in this case, annual figures), add them up, and then divide the total by the number of returns in the series. Geometric returns (also called compound returns) involve slightly more complicated maths.
Answer:
A wave that has been digitized can be played back as a wave over and over, and it will be the same every time. For that reason, digital signals are a very reliable way to record information—as long as the numbers in the digital signal don’t change, the information can be reproduced exactly over and over again.
Explanation:
Answer: (A) Fixed interval
Explanation:
The fixed interval schedule is the type of schedule of the reinforcement in the operand conditioning in which the the initial response are rewarded by some specific amount of the time.
The main issue with the fixed interval schedule is that the people have to wait until the reinforcement schedule get occur and start their actual response of interval. This type of reinforcement schedule occur as the output value does not posses constant value all the time.
Therefore, Option (A) is correct.
A scientific experiment is repeatable. Pseudoscience makes claims that cannot be either confirmed or denied. Both seem to want to explain our experiences and broaden our understanding. Science, as a working method, employs basic principles such as objectivity and accuracy to establish a finding. It often also uses certain admitted assumptions about reality, assumptions that must eventually support themselves and be proven, or the resulting finding fails verification. Pseudoscience, however, uses invented modes of analysis which it pretends or professes meet the requirements of scientific method, but which in fact violate it's essential attributes. Many obvious examples of pseudoscience are easy to identify, but the more subtile and herefore more insidious and convincing cases.
