The student is incorrect, the actual x-intercept is (5, 0).
<h3>Is the student correct or incorrect?</h3>
Here we have the equation:
x + 2y = 5
The student says that the x-intercept is the point (0, 5).
So if you look at the point you already can see that the student is incorrect, this is because the x-intercept always must have a y-value of 0. (the graph only intercepts the x-axis when y = 0).
So the point (0, 5) can't be an x-intercept.
For the given function:
x +2y = 5
The x-intercept is given by:
x + 2*0 = 5
x = 5
So it is (5 , 0).
If you want to learn more about x-intercepts:
brainly.com/question/3951754
#SPJ1
Answer:
0.05?
Step-by-step explanation:
0.2 are taken by oarents
3/4 = 0.75 were taken by parents
0.20 + 0.75 = 0.95
1.00 - 0.95 = 0.05
We can set it up like this, where <em>s </em>is the speed of the canoeist:

To make a common denominator between the fractions, we can multiply the whole equation by s(s-5):
![s(s-5)[\frac{18}{s} + \frac{4}{s-5} = 3] \\ 18(s-5)+4s=3s(s-5) \\ 18s - 90+4s=3 s^{2} -15s](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s%28s-5%29%5B%5Cfrac%7B18%7D%7Bs%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7Bs-5%7D%20%3D%203%5D%20%5C%5C%2018%28s-5%29%2B4s%3D3s%28s-5%29%20%5C%5C%2018s%20-%2090%2B4s%3D3%20s%5E%7B2%7D%20-15s)
If we rearrange this, we can turn it into a quadratic equation and factor:

Technically, either of these solutions would work when plugged into the original equation, but I would use the second solution because it's a little "neater." We have the speed for the first part of the trip (9 mph); now we just need to subtract 5mph to get the speed for the second part of the trip.

The canoeist's speed on the first part of the trip was 9mph, and their speed on the second part was 4mph.
0, the slope and y-intercept is 0