1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cricket20 [7]
2 years ago
6

HEEEEEELP. I SERIOSLY NEED YOUR HELP. I JUST NEED THIS QUESTION ANSWERED AND THEN ILL PASS. IF I DONT....well...…you dont want t

o know. SO PLEASE HELP ME FOR GODNNESSS SAKE

History
1 answer:
melamori03 [73]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Great Compromise settled matters of representation in the federal government, (Selecting the president).

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise settled matters of representation when it came to the enslaved population of southern states and the importation of enslaved Africans. The Electoral College settled how the president would be elected.

Therefore, they decided on the process of selecting the president, B.

You might be interested in
8. ALGEBRA Maria Leon's charge account uses the unpaid-balance
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

yes yes Percent nominated by Republican presidents Percent nominated by Republican presidents Percent nominated by Republican presidents Percent nominated by Republican presidents Percent nominated by Republican presidents Percent nominated by Republican presidents Percent nominated by Republican presidents Percent nominated by Republican presidents Percent nominated by Republican presidents Percent nominated by Republican presidents

5 0
4 years ago
What is demonstrated by the willingness of Leiningen's men to remain and battle the ants?
geniusboy [140]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "c. the men's trust in Leiningen's leadership" The thing that is demonstrated by the willingness of Leiningen's men to remain and battle the ants is <span>the men's trust in Leiningen's leadership</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?
Vilka [71]
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which statements describe the gods according to Greek
koban [17]

Answer:

1. True

2. False

3. True

4. not sure

5. False

6. False

Explanation:

hope that helps. if you're interested you can read the comic Lore Olympus on Webtoon app. it really helped me and it's really good as well :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the difference between consentration camps and death camps
Mkey [24]

Answer: Concentration camps were for labor and for people to awate being killed. Death camps were for killing people.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In which section of the declaration or independence do the signers assert to uphold their duty?
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASEEE HELP!!!! Whats an example of the Supremacy Clause coming up in a conflict between state and federal law?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the battle of bunker hill change british strategy at the beginning of the american revolutionary war?
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the roads of the Roman Empire? A. They had to be built with stones provided by Rome. B. They were
    8·2 answers
  • What happened in 1643
    11·2 answers
  • What 2 actions were taken by the federal government?
    12·1 answer
  • What's the restoring of friendship &amp; peace called?
    9·1 answer
  • to what degree would this image like this increase demand among Americans to invade Cuba to throw out the Spanish?​
    13·2 answers
  • If you were a Jamestown settler why might you NOT be very optimistic about your future?
    11·1 answer
  • How was the advent of the trolley most beneficial to workers? trolleys were a cheap form of transportation. workers could get to
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!