Answer:
Colonizing countries were pioneer to acquire Industrial revolution, master in sea navigation and technological development. Colonized countries were deficient in above features.
Explanation:
European countries were colonizing countries such as Britian, Spain, Portugal and so on. Asian, African and American countries were colonized countries under European powers. Many European countries were witnessed the Industrial revolition in mid 18th century but colonized countries were exporters of raw materials and consumer of finished goods till their decolonisation. There is no technological and infrastructural development in colonised countries whereas colonial powers were superior in science, arts, literatures and so on.
The workers are specialized if they perform only smaller tasks and if they become better and better at these tasks - "specialists". This means that the whole process is divided into smaller takss that the workers can specialize in.
Therefore the correct answer is
D. dividing labor into smaller specific tasks
Answer:
Trigger words
Explanation:
Trigger words are words or phrases that a listener emotionally reacts to due to previous experience they've had where that particular word also played a role.
It awakens the subconscious of the listener as it flashes back his/her mind to the incident which happened where same word has occured before.
Answer: B. False
Explanation: Parenthetical citations are citations or notes that allow readers to know the original sources that appear in the body of your paper. Hence there won't be need for end notes or foot notes.
One of the rules of parenthetical citations concerning the ampersand and 'and' where two or more authors are involved is
1. You use 'and' to separate the last names if you mentioned the authors’ names in a sentence (in-text).
2. You use ampersand (&) to separate the last names if you place the authors’ names in the parenthetical citation.
Hence the answer to the question is false.
The correct answer is B) the rise of partisanship in Congress.
The scrutiny of the nominated judges mirrors the rise of partisanship in Congress.
Many politicians and experts think that the scrutiny of the nominees to federal judges is important because of the level of responsibility they are going to have in their positions. So much has been discussed in this regard, including in the US Congress, where legislators have emphasized the importance of having exemplary judges in the Supreme Court that honor the principles of the judicial branch.
