Answer:
B. States must provide minors accused of crimes with most of the same "due process" rights given to adults.
Explanation:
The passage below is from the U.S. Supreme Court decision In re Gault (1967). From the inception of the juvenile court system, wide differences have been tolerated... between the procedural rights accorded to adults and those of juveniles. In practically all jurisdictions, there are rights granted to adults, which are withheld from juveniles.. [H]istory has again demonstrated that unbridled discretion, however benevolently motivated, is frequently a poor substitute for principle and procedure... Which conclusion did the Court draw from this reasoning?
In re Gault was a case where parents believed their child was denied due process. The court ruled that states must reform their procedures of juvenile justice in order words,States must provide minors accused of crimes with most of the same "due process" rights given to adults.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "c. value." Value <span>is the customer's perception that a product has a strong, positive relationship between its cost and benefits. It is considered as one of the strong target of marketers to get from the customers.</span>
Answer: Consensus
Explanation: Consensus is the extent to which other people behave in the same way in a similar situation. Jamal new boyfriend reaction and other audience to a performer at a comedy club signifies a high consensus among every member of the audience. If he compares her boyfriend response to the comedian and the other member of the audience, she is said to be focusing on consensus information.
I have the same questions and I use Google to give me the answer and I wrote them down.
Answer: a. True
Explanation: Ethical Relativism is the belief that ethics are relative to an individual or a society. In essence, what is morally wrong to one person may not be to another. Each will have a reason and justification why it is right or wrong. Using this way of thinking, judgement of what is right or wrong has to be defined by the society’s rules and are not universal.
Ethical Relativism, in its weak form, makes room for objective moral principles while holding that these principles will need to be applied differently in different contexts.
