6.4%
200 from the 5% of 4000
140 from 4% on 3500
160 on 6.4% on 2500
Answer:
the answer is D terms and conditions set forth in a lending agreement to reduce the probability of non-payment
Explanation:
covenants help lenders detect deteriorating loan quality.
Answer:
Current issues in the framework by regarding fabricating costs as a period cost
Assembling overhead is evaluated bu increasing direct work with 300%. This estimation isn't exact and doesn't speak to how the genuine variable sub-costs that form the manufacturing overhead act for example machine related costs, arrangement work, getting and creation control, designing, bundling and sending. In spite of the fact that there could be a connection between the measure of direct work cost and the all out manufacturing overhead, this present strategy for estimation is dubious and ignores the real segments of manufacturing overhead.
Advantage of Product Cost
Increasingly exact impression of the inconstancy of the sources for example on the off chance that there are five factors, it is more precise than one.
Advantage of Period Cost
Treating manufacturing overhead as a period cost implies that it stays simpler to contrast Wilkerson's and a rival, given that contender likewise treats manufacturing overhead as a period cost for example it is simpler to analyze like-for-like
Answer:
b) The company will incur a loss
Explanation:
The market rate at the time of issue = 9%, while coupon rate = 8%, it says bonds provide lesser return when compared to the market rate.
At end of year 2 market rate drops to 6% which is lower than the Bond's coupon rate. Which means the bond's providing high return when compared to the market. So, company to retire the bonds need to pay more than the par value.
As company should retire these bonds more than par value, the company incur a loss.
Option 'B is correct
The company incur a loss
The question is reconstructed below:
Which of the following best describes a Nash equilibrium?
A. An outcome from which one or both competitors can improve their position by adopting an alternative strategy.
B. The unstable outcome of a repeated game.
C. An outcome that is stable only because of credible threats.
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Answer:
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Explanation:
Although Nash equilibrium is a game theory, it has been widely applied in economics. It states that a competitor can achieve his desired outcome by sticking to his original strategy. Both competitors' strategies are optimal when considering the decisions of each other.
