Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
Answer:
D. Dr. Benson’s study in which she measured people’s spatial manipulation ability in August and measured their ability again in May after they had taken two semesters of art classes.
Explanation:
Hello! Longitudinal studies are a research method that consists in measuring a phenomenon over a certain time interval. In this sense, they serve to analyze and observe in a sequential way the evolution of a phenomenon. The main objective is to obtain information about the process of change.
Thanks for your question!
The answer is : The demand would most likely increasing
Phrases such as "all boots must go" tend to be used if the businesses want to restock its warehouse with new products. Because of this, it is very likely that they would sell the boots under a huge discount. According to the law of demand, this decrease in price would increase the number of demand from consumers.
Answer:
<em>What this means is that, Gandhi has given the Indians the right to fight for thier freedom (That is, he santioned the protest to ensure that Indians gained their independence through his "Do or Die mantra"- Get the indepence or die trying)</em>
Explanation:
Gandhi is an Indian Statesman who wanted to see India free from the colonial masters grip. He led a series of non violent protest against the British government in trying to persuade them to allow the Indians to gain their independence.
<em>During the Quit India movement of 1942, Gandhi did give a slogan of “Do or Die” Gandhi believed in leading by example hence the reason why he is always present during the protest.</em>
Answer:
B) systematic observation
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing. The options are:
A) self-report
B) systematic observation
C) sampling behavior with tasks
D) interview
In research, the term systematic observation refers to a process to get data by which t<u>he researcher makes observations of the subjects of the study in an objective way</u>, not considering the researcher own prejudices by collecting data without biases from the researcher (which would come from the interpretation of the observations).
In this example Irina watches 10 babies once a month from birth to 2 years of age and writes down the sounds they make and the words they use. We can see that <u>she is observing the babies in an objective and close way and by writing down the sounds and words she is actually taking an objective measure of language development</u>. Therefore this would be an example of systematic observation.
