Answer:
The information in ""Midnight Ride"" and the personal connection of us with the Midnight Ride was discussed below.
Explanation:
The main objective of the Paul revere's Midnight Ride as you can remember from your school days history class when your teacher told you about the race towards Concord to alert Patriots John Hancock and Samuel Adams about British troops and how they are coming to attack them and warm them to get ready for the attack.
Revolutionary war master Paul revere informed the colonist of the advancing by the British army, Paul rode his horse in the Midnight warning every village and township.
Paul revere warn the colonist prepared by the Revere's warning and defeat the British forces.
This question is about the poem "What Love Isn't"
Answer:
They contribute by showing that lived love is very different from assisted or heard love.
Explanation:
The poem shows that experiencing love is completely different from everything we watch or hear, especially in relation to the films, because the films show an easy love, where everything is resolved quickly with happiness and joy. However, in real life, love goes through very difficult trials that can often overcome love.
Music on the other hand, has a more realistic view of love, but also idealized and very particular to the singer and composer. Since, each person has a different experience on how to love.
Answer:
The correct answer is actually the best astronauts in the world.
Explanation:
An object complement follows a direct object with the purpose of renaming it or stating what it has become. Certain verbs commonly attract object complements, such as to consider, to call, to to create, to make, etc. <u>It is important to remember that the object complement can be a noun, a pronoun, an adjective, or a </u><u>phrase</u><u>.</u> Study the example below:
- We consider them <u>intelligent</u>.
"Them" is the direct object of "consider". It is followed by the adjective "intelligent", which functions as the object complement. Notice that the sentence we are supposed to analyze is similar:
- We consider them <u>the best astronauts in the world</u>.
This time, the object "them" has a whole phrase as its complement, "the best astronauts in the world". It's as if we are answering a question about the object. For the first sentence, what do we consider them? Intelligent. For the second one, what do we consider them? The best astronauts in the world.
B because it specificly says battle which is war talk
