Answer:
The answer is 156.25
Explanation:
In the 1st year:
- Interest: 2,500 x 5% = 125
- Payment amount: 125 x 175% = 218.75
- Principal: 218.75 - 125 = 93.75
Hence, the principal payment in 20 year loan as follow:
10 x 93.75 + 10 x X = 2,500
=> X = 156.25
Answer:
Earnings per share
= <u>Net income - Preferred dividend </u>
No of common stocks outstanding
= <u>$1,500,000 - 0</u>
1,000,000 shares
= $1.50 per share
P/E ratio = <u>Market price per share</u>
Earnings per share
15 = <u>Market price per share</u>
$1.50
Market price per share = 15 x $1.50
= $22.50
Explanation:
In this question, there is need to calculate earnings per share by dividing net income by number of common stocks outstanding. Thereafter, we will apply P/E ratio formula, where P/E ratio and earnings per share are known. We will make market price per share the subject of the formula.
Answer:
A.)
Explanation:
two or more connected computers
Answer:
It may lead to groupthink.
It may affect the message's clarity.
Explanation:
Collaborative business message writing has to do with when a group of people creates a project or business message together rather than doing it individually.
Groupthink describes when a group sets asides their personal belief to get a consensus within a group and this can lead to bad decisions as members of the group can sidestep problems in order to fit into a group's decisions.
The clarity of the message can be affected because the different members of the group all have different ideas and would try to sacrifice some of their ideas for the group.
Answer: Trained incapacity
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the idea that after gaining a certain kind of education, skill or experience etc. the level of thinking of an individual cannot go beyond a certain limit.
In the given case, the manager was the upper level employee and was not habitual to the work that was performed by the workers in the restaurant.
Therefore this position in the workplace limited his skills of performing only the managerial work.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the above case depicts trained incapacity.
