Answer:
Ending retained earning will be $433750
Explanation:
We have given beginning balance = $430000
Net income = $60000
Dividend paid = $56250
We have to find the ending balance
We know that ending retained earning is given by
Ending retained earning = beginning retained earning + net income - dividend paid
So Ending retained earning = $430000+$60000-$56250 = $433750
Answer:
Break Even Point
In Units = 2,000 units
In value = $80,000
Explanation:
Break even Point = 
When we use contribution per unit, we get the break even point in units sales.
When we use the contribution margin as a percentage of sales we get break even sales in value.
Contribution per unit = $20
Contribution margin in percentage = $20/$40 = 50%
Therefore, Break even Point in units = 
Break even units = 2,000
Break Even Point in value = 
Sales to be made in value at break even = $80,000
Answer:
The correct option is c. $8.
Explanation:
Ken will maximize utility where the following equation holds:
MU of Sprite / Price of Sprite = MU of potato chips / Price of potato chips ................. (1)
Where;
MU of Sprite = Marginal utility of Sprite = 3
Price of Sprite = $1 per can
From the table in the question, equation (1) holds at the point where Marginal utility of potato chips is 6 since the Potato chips cost $2 per bag.
Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:
MU of Sprite / Price of Sprite = MU of potato chips / Price of potato chips => 3 / 1 = 6 / 2 = 3
Since when the marginal utility of potato chips that maximizes utility is 6, Ken consumes 4 Bags of Potato chips monthly and pays $2 per bag at this point, the amount he spends on potato chips each month can be calculated as follows:
Amount spent on potato monthly = Number of bags of Potato chips consumed monthly * Cost of potato chips per bag = 4 * $2 = $8
Therefore, the correct option is c. $8.
Answer: No it is not.
Explanation:
Uber by first establishing itself and then fighting regulators leaves itself open to attack around the world. This is because the Regulators have the power to keep adjusting the laws that govern Uber if they feel that Uber has an unfair advantage or if it's existence is detrimental to the society. Uber has been accused many times of various infractions such as Tax Evasions and being a conduit through which crime can be committed because it did not conduct proper background checks.
Going back to the issue of taxes, if the regulators feel that Uber may be avoiding taxes, they could impose laws that either cause an increase in Uber prices or remove them from a location which can have a native influence on Uber's bottomline.
This approach is not good because regulators do not like being fought and will try to ascert dominance. It is simply not viable and this has been proven with Uber's many suspensions around the world.
