How do the three branches of the US government limit each other’s powers?

Why might the values to the right represent less significant change compared to the values at the left? Based on the information

timama [110]

Answer:

Politics defines us all as citizens. We usually talk about left or right policies, but these policies are different in each country, criteria of how the government is organized, its laws and its institutions.

Explanation:

To answer the first question, the intellectual tradition of the left has defended the values of freedom, equality and community. On the right we find two traditions, on the one hand, liberalism, which has defended the value of freedom and its corollaries of tolerance and free exchange in the market and, on the other hand, the conservative tradition, which has defended the values of authority, tradition, cultural homogeneity and natural inequality of man. Both the left and the right have had an ambiguous relationship towards democracy. Although it can be said that the expansion of suffrage has been a consequence of the struggles of the left, the truth is that the tradition of socialism defended parliamentary democracy as a means to reach alternative socialism to the revolution. On the right, the conservative tradition has been undemocratic, while liberalism has considered that democracy is not compatible with the concept of freedom.

For the second question, to prevent pollution, policies on air quality and transport are needed, through regulations that control pollution in cities, emission controls in the industry and the promotion of clean energy sources and renewable. Measures may include: replacing solid fuel with cleaner fuels in homes, applying efficient ventilation technologies and systems in homes, schools and at work. All efforts to reduce air pollutants will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the effects of global warming.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

*PLEASE ANSWER, NEED HELP*

prohojiy [21]

Answer:

Pennsylavania

Explanation:

The residents of Pennsylavania actually offered to buy their land from the Native americans leading to better relations

6 0

3 years ago

What principles did calvin Coolidge believe would lead to economic growth for the country?

Airida [17]

Calvin Coolidge wanted a government- a society that overlooks the flaws, grafts, and corruptions of their world.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Select the items that describe antitrust laws.

kupik [55]

The correct answer of the given question above would be the first option. The statement that describes Antitrust laws is that, it is created to prevent monopolies. The Antitrust laws <span>are rules that prevent the creation and behavior of monopolies. Hope this is the answer you are looking for. </span>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statements are true about the magna Carta

almond37 [142]

Answer:

3. The Magna Carta guaranteed that the king could not impose new taxes without permission from a council.

1. English barons and church leaders wrote the Magna Carta because they could no longer tolerate King John's abuses of their traditional rights.

Another way to rephrase the first one is;

Among the many restrictions placed upon the King by the Nobles was the idea that the king could not impose taxes without the approval of the “common counsel” of the Kingdom:

Another way to rephrase the second one is;

The committee of Twenty Five were a group of barons in the forefront of the opposition to King John who were entrusted by the terms of clause 61 of Magna Carta to ensure the king’s compliance with its terms.

The church clergy that helped were Cathedral churches in Salisbury and Lincoln.

Explanation:

Justice

King John’s father, Henry II (r. 1154–89), introduced extensive judicial reforms, established the authority of the royal courts and laid firm foundations for the future system of justice in England. In contrast, John regularly abused the justice system to suppress his opponents and to extort revenue from the barons. The justice system and feudal law were two of the main themes addressed in Magna Carta, and the most famous clause dealt with justice:

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.

The barons ensured that numerous other clauses in Magna Carta defined in more detail how the justice system and its officials were to operate. These clauses sought to remedy specific abuses by the king and to make the system more consistent, accessible and fair.

Magna Carta and peace

Many of the clauses towards the end of Magna Carta were practical arrangements for making peace. Rather than looking forward to how the king was to behave in the future, these clauses sought to put right the wrongs done by King John.

The king was immediately to return all hostages, to remove all foreign knights and mercenaries from England, to remit all fines exacted unjustly, and to restore lands, castles and liberties to all who had been wrongfully deprived of them. These clauses were not statements of legal principle, but they were a part of the peace-making process.

All the others are not true as King John had no choice at all.

Perhaps the most radical clause in Magna Carta was the 61st, which set up an elected commission of 25 barons to monitor the king’s compliance with the settlement and to enforce its terms. The 25 barons had the power to seize the king’s property in order to seek redress if he failed to keep the terms imposed on him. This innovative clause demonstrated the power invested in Magna Carta to limit royal authority

6 0

2 years ago