The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following.
The kind of testimony their claim represents is a general statement without any evidence to prove it. It is not a claim of fact because it does not present any evidence. It is neither a claim of policy. We could say that it could be a claim of value, but it doesn't say if this is good or bad.
So it is important to include some type of evidence to back our affirmations. Without the proper evidence, then it is their opinions against ours.
So it is hard to believe that hunters Harlen E. Ford and Billy Mills have seen Bigfoot at one time if they don't provide proper evidence.
The committee assignment process in the Senate is guided by Senate rules along with party ... the start of each new Congress to elect leaders and determine committee assignments.
This is not me fighting<span> against the </span>tide of history but being swept<span> along with it.
The word 'against' give clearer explanation on what the speaker is opposed to (in this case it's conventiional belief) and the word 'along' indicates that the speaker do not want to just simply follow what the majority of people tell him/her what to follow.</span>